Characteristics of Palatal Rugae Patterns as a Potential Tool for Sex Discrimination in a Sample of Iranian Children

Pakshir, Fatemeh; Ajami, Shabnam; Pakshir, Hamidreza; Malekzadeh, Alireza

doi:10.30476/dentjods.2019.44556

Characteristics of Palatal Rugae Patterns as a Potential Tool for Sex Discrimination in a Sample of Iranian Children

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Fatemeh Pakshir ¹

Shabnam Ajami ²

Hamidreza Pakshir ²

Alireza Malekzadeh ¹

¹ Student Research Centre, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

² Orthodontic Research Center, Dept. of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.30476/dentjods.2019.44556

Abstract

Statement of the Problem: Palatal rugae have been considered equivalent to fingerprints, as they are unique to each individual. It has been shown that palatal rugae are associated with specific racial groups and are known to aid sex identification. Due to the lack of any published data on palatal rugae morphology on Iranian children, the present study was performed.Purpose: The present study aimed to investigate differences in the morphology of individual palatal in a sample of Iranian children. Additionally, it is intended to develop discriminant function to identify sex, based on rugae morphology.Materials and Method: A total of 120 pre-orthodontic casts were evaluated for different rugae patterns using the Thomas and Kotze classification. The casts were equally distributed between sexes with an age range of 6-12 years. Rugae length, shape, and associated morphology were recorded and the independent t test and Chi-square test were used to compare the mean and relationship between the attributes. The discriminant function analysis was applied to the data in order to determine the applicability of palatal rugae patterns as an aid for sex identification.Results: While the total rugae count showed an insignificant difference between the males and females, the rugae count on the right side of the palates showed a significant difference (p= 0.046). The primary rugae were most common in both sexes, followed by the secondary and fragmentary rugae. The most prevalent rugae shape between both sexes was the wavy rugae followed by the curve and straight shapes in males and the straight and curve shapes in females. A significant difference was observed in the number of the curve rugae between the sexes. Discriminant function analysis allowed sex differentiation with an accuracy of 60.8%.Conclusion: Palatal rugae shapes are unique to each individual and could be used as a potential tool for sex identification. Further research on a larger sample is required to fully confirm the application of this method (e.g. in forensic medicine) as a complementary technique for sex identification.

Keywords

Palatal Rugae

Rugae Pattern

Forensic Identification

Sex Assessment

Iranian Children

Discriminant Function

Analysis

1. Lysell L. Plicae palatinae transversae and papilla incisiva in man; a morphologicand genetic study. Acta Odontol Scand. 1955; 13(Suppl. 18): 5–137. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

2. Thomas CJ, Kotze TJ, Van der Merwe CA. An improved statistical method for the racial classification of man by means of palatal rugae. Arch Oral Biol. 1987; 32: 315–317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

3. Sivaraj A. Significance of palatal rugae in orthodontics. J Orofac Res. 2013; 3:202–209. [Google Scholar]

4. Salzman JA. Review of Lysell L. Plica palatinae transversae and papillae incisiva in man - amorphologic and genetic study. Am J Orthod 1955; 41: 879–880. [Google Scholar]

5. Indira A, Gupta M, David MP. Usefullness of palatal rugae patterns in establishing identity: Preliminary results from Bengaluru city, India. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2012; 4: 2–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

6. Acharya AB, Sivapathasundaram B. Forensic odontology. In: Rajendran R, Sivapathasundaram B, editors. Shafer’s Textbook of Oral Pathology. 5th ed. New Delhi, India: Elsevier Publications; 2007. p. 886. [Google Scholar]

7. Muthusubramanian M, Limson KS, Julian R. Analysis of rugae in burn victims and cadavers to simulate rugaeidentification in cases of incineration and decomposition. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2005; 23: 26–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Segelinck SL, Goldstein L. Forensic application of palatal rugae in dental identification. Forensic Exam Spring. 2005; 14: 44–77. [Google Scholar]

9. Winslow JB. Expositio anatomica structurae corporis humani. Available at: [https://catalog.hathitrust.org/ Record/ 009275727. ]

10. Hermosilla VV, San Pendro VJ, Cantin LM, Suazo GI, Ruga P. Systematic analysis of its shape and dimensions for use in human identification. Int J Morphol. 2009; 27:819–825. [Google Scholar]

11. Peavy DC Jr, Kendrick GS. The effects of tooth movement on the palatine rugae. J Prosthet Dent. 1967; 18: 536–542. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Limson KS, Julian R. Computerized recording of the palatal rugae pattern and an evaluation of its application in forensic identification. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2004; 22: 1–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

13. Patil MS, Patil SB, Acharya AB. Palatine rugae and their significance in clinical dentistry: a review of the literature. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008; 139: 1471–1478. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. Kapali S, Townsend G, Richards L, Parish T. Palatal rugae patterns in Australian aborigines and Caucasians. Aust Dent J. 1997; 42: 129–133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15. Thomas CJ, Kotze TJ. The palatal ruga pattern in six southern African human populations, partI: A description of the populations and a method for its investigation. J Dent Assoc S Afr. 1983; 38: 547–553. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Van der Linden FP. Changes in the position of posterior teeth in relation to ruga points. Am J Orthod. 1978; 74: 142–161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17. Buchtova M, Tichy F, Putnova I, Misek I. The development of palatal rugae in the European pine vole, Microtus subterraneus (Arvicolidae, Rodentia) Folia Zool. 2003; 52: 127–136. [Google Scholar]

18. Thomas CJ, Van Wyk Elastic fibre and hyaluronic acid in the core of human palatal rugae. J Biol Buccale. 1987; 15: 171–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

19. Thomas CJ, Kotze TJ. The palatal rugae pattern in six South African human populations. Part –II. Inter racial differences. Inter racial differences J Dent Assoc S Afr. 1983; 38:166–172. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. Shetty SK, Kalia S, Patil K, Mahima VG. Palatal rugae pattern in Mysorean and Tibetan populations. Indian J Dent Res. 2005; 16: 51–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

21. Gadicherla P, Saini D, Bhaskar M. Palatal rugae pattern: An aid for sex identification. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2017; 9: 48–49. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

22. Sognnaes RD. Forensic stomatology (third of three parts) N Engl J Med. 1977; 296: 197–203. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

23. Gautam N, Patil SG, Krishna RG, Agastya H, Mushtaq L, Kumar KV. Association of Palatal Rugae Pattern in Gender Identification: An Exploratory Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017; 18: 470–473. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

24. Caldas IM, Magalhães T, Afonso A. Establishing identity using cheiloscopy and palatoscopy. Forensic Sci Int. 2007; 165: 1–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

25. Gillespie TH, Brannon RB, Grayson FW, Gardner JD. Dental identification of remains from the 23 October 1983 bombing of the U.S. Marine Headquarters, Beirut, Lebanon. Mil Med. 1985; 150: 635–639. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

26. Fahmi FM, Al-Shamrani SM, Talic YF. Rugae pattern in Saudi population sample of males and females. Saudi Dental J. 2001; 13: 92–95. [Google Scholar]

27. Dhoke M, Osato S. Morphological study of the palatal rugae in Japanese. Bilateral difference in the regressive evolution of the palatal rugae. Jpn J Oral Biol . 1994; 36:126–140. [Google Scholar]

28. Kashima K. Comparative study of the palatal rugae and shape of the hard palatal in Japanese and Indian children. Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi. 1990; 28(1 Pt 2): 295–320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

29. Nayak P, Acharya AB, Padmini AT, Kaveri H. Differences in the palatal rugae shape in two populations of India. Arch Oral Biol. 2007; 52: 977–982. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

30. Abdellatif AM, Awad SM, Hammad SM. Comparative study of palatal rugae shape in two samples of Egyptian and Saudi children. Pediatric Dent J. 2011; 21:123–128. [Google Scholar]

31. Abdulmajid Z, Bugaighis I. Evaluation of the Morphology of Palatal Rugae in Libyan School Children. J Dent Res. 2015;2:024. [Google Scholar]

32. Hauser G, Daponte A, Roberts MJ. Palatal rugae. J Anat. 1989; 165: 237–249. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

33. Rath R, Reginald BA. Palatal rugae: An effective marker in population differentiation. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2014; 6: 46–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

34. Saraf A, Bedia S, Indurkar A, Degwekar S, Bhowate R. Rugae patterns as an adjunct to sex differentiation in forensicidentification. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2011; 29: 14–19. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

35. Bharath ST, Kumar GR, Dhanapal R, Saraswathi T. Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of palatal rugae from a population of coastal Andhra. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2011; 3: 58–62. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

36. Madhan Kumar S, Natarajan S, Maheshwari U, Kumar VA, Veeravalli PT, Banu F. Palatal rugae pattern for gender identification among selected student population in Chennai, India. J Sci Res Rep. 2013; 2:491–496. [Google Scholar]