Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Member of Oral and Dental Diseases Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

2 Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Yazd Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.

3 Epidemiologist, Oral and Dental Disease Research Center and Kerman Social Determinants on Oral Health Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

Abstract

Statement of the Problem: Swelling of the surrounding tissue of surgical site is one of the most common, devastating effects after maxillofacial surgery and can have an effect on quality of life and the patients' satisfaction.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of a custom-made appliance by the method of Computer-aided design/Computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) compared with conventional dressing for reducing facial swelling after maxillofacial surgery. 
Materials and Method: This clinical trial accomplished in 14 patients voluntarily referred to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Bahonar hospital in Kerman. These patients were the candidate for surgical treatment of similar bilateral facial fractures (10 patients) and orthognathic surgery (4 patients). Facial computed tomography (CT) scans of the patients were taken to build up a custom-made appliance. Based on three-dimensional reconstruction from facial CT scan data, custom-made appliance was designed and built. Swelling on one side with custom-made appliance and on the opposite side with conventional dressing measured with paper tape graded before surgery, immediately after surgery, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 7 days later, we divided the patients into two groups of trauma and orthognathic surgical procedures
Results: Based on the defined landmarks, all of the measurements were performed on both sides. Statistical analyses do not show any asymmetry before surgery (p = 0.48). In addition, there was no significant difference between two methods of dressing on the day of surgery and a day later (p = 0.084, p = 0.09), but there was a significant difference between two methods of dressing on second and seventh days. The swelling has decreased faster and further in our new method.
Conclusion: Regarding the exact adaptation to the surgical site on facial skin, using custom-made appliance by the method of CAD/CAM could be an effective tool that reduces swelling after maxillofacial surgery.

Keywords

1. Szolnoky G, Szendi-Horváth K, Seres L, Boda K, Kemény L. Manual lymph drainage efficiently reduces postoperative facial swellingand discomfort after removal of impacted third molars. Lymphology. 2007; 40: 138–142. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
2. Rana M, Gellrich NC, Joos U, Piffkó J, Kater W. 3D evaluation of postoperative swelling using two different coolingmethods following orthognathic surgery: a randomised observer blind prospective pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 40: 690–696. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
3. Rana M, Gellrich NC, von See C, Weiskopf C, Gerressen M, Ghassemi A, et al. 3D evaluation of postoperative swelling in treatment of bilateralmandibular fractures using 2 different cooling therapy methods: a randomized observer blind prospective study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013; 41: e17–e23. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
4. Thaer AL, Salwan YH, Jamal AM. The influence of prophylactic dexamethasone on postoperative swelling and trismus following impacted mandibular third molar surgical extraction. J Bagh Colls Dentistry. 2010; 22: 85–90. [Google Scholar]
5. Villafuerte-Nuñez AE, Téllez-Anguiano AC, Hernández-Díaz O. Facial Edema Evaluation Using Digital Image Processing. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society. Available at: [https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ddns/ 2013/927843/ . ]
6. Hirai M, Niimi K, Iwata H, Sugimoto I, Ishibashi H, Ota T, Nakamura H. A comparison of interface pressure and stiffness between elastic stockings and bandages. Phlebology. 2009; 24: 120–124. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
7. Feng Z, Dong Y, Zhao Y, Bai S, Zhou B, Bi Y, Wu G. Computer-assisted technique for the design and manufacture of realistic facial prostheses. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 48: 105–109. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
8. de Santana-Santos T, de Souza-Santos A, Martins-Filho PR, da Silva LC, de Oliveira E Silva ED, Gomes AC. Prediction of postoperative facial swelling, pain and trismus followingthird molar surgery based on preoperative variables. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013; 18: e65–e70. [PMC free article] [PubMed[Google Scholar]
9. Gasperini G, Rodrigues de Siqueira IC, Rezende Costa L. Does low-level laser therapy decrease swelling and pain resulting from orthognathic surgery? . Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;43:868–873. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
10. Ristow O, Hohlweg-Majert B, Kehl V, Koerdt S, Hahnefeld L, Pautke C. Does elastic therapeutic tape reduce postoperative swelling, pain, and trismus after open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular fractures? . J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 71: 1387–1396. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
11. Lietz-Kijak D, Kijak E, Krajczy M, Bogacz K, Łuniewski J, Szczegielniak J. The Impact of the Use of Kinesio Taping Method on the Reduction of Swelling in Patients After Orthognathic Surgery: A Pilot Study. Med Sci Monit . 2018;24:3736–3743. [PMC free article] [PubMed[Google Scholar]
12. Modabber A, Madiha R, Ghassemi A, Marcus G, Nils-Claudius G, Frank H, Majeed R. Three-dimensional evaluation of postoperative swelling in treatment of zygomatic bone fractures using two different cooling therapy methods: a randomized, observer-blind, prospective study. Trials . 2013;14:238. [PMC free article] [PubMed[Google Scholar]
13. Barbosa-Rebellato NL, Thomé AC, Costa-Maciel C, Oliveira J, Scariot R. Factors associated with complications of removal of third molars: a transversal study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011; 16: e376–e380. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
14. Akadiri OA, Obiechina AE. Assessment of difficulty in third molar surgery--a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67: 771–774. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
15. Gbotolorun OM, Arotiba GT, Ladeinde AL. Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty in impactedmandibular third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg . 2007;65 :1977 –1983. [PubMed[Google Scholar]