Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Dental Material Research Center, Dept. of Pediatric Dentistry, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.

2 Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.

3 Oral Health Research Center, Dept. of Pediatric Dentistry, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.

4 Dental Material Research Center, Dept. of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Abstract

Statement of the Problem: Several additives have been introduced to decrease the setting time of MTA (mineral trioxide aggregate). For clinical applications, it is essential to investigate the biocompatibility of these materials.
Purpose: The present study evaluated the tissue response to MTA that has been separately mixed with citric acid, calcium lactate gluconate (CLG), and Na2HPo4.
Materials and Method: In this experimental studyTwenty one Wistar rats were divided into three groups of 7, 14 and 30 days follow up periods. Sterile polyethylene tubes were subsequently filled with MTA separately mixed with distilled water, 0.1% citric acid, 0.43% calcium lactate gluconate (CLG) and 15% Na2HPO4 and afterwards implanted subcutaneously. Empty tubes were implanted as negative control. At the end of their respective periods, the animals were sacrificed by anesthetic overdose and a biopsy was performed. The inflammatory responses were scored, classified and statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Man-Whitney [V1] tests. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.
Results: There was no significant difference between test groups in any time period after implantation but the mean values of inflammatory responses were significantly more than that of the negative control group (p > 0.05). The mean values of inflammatory responses were decreasing over time in all test groups. These values did not significantly differ in any group except the CLG and Na2HPO4 groups.
Conclusion: The inflammatory responses induced by MTA mixed with citric acid and MTA mixed with Na2HPo4 were comparable to that of the control MTA. MTA mixed with CLG provoked a moderate-to-severe inflammatory response at 7 days after implantation, so further study is required before clinical application of this cement

Keywords

1. Perez E, Behar-Horenstein LS, Guelmann M. Direct pulp capping in primary molars: Report of two cases. J Pediatr Dent. 2015; 3: 101–103. [Google Scholar]
2. Fuks A, Kupietzki A, Guelmann M. Pulp therapy for the primary dentition. In: Pediatric Dentistry: Infancy through Adolescence. 5th ed . St Louis, Mo: Elsevier, Saunders; 2013. pp. 333–351. [Google Scholar]
3. Çelik BN, Sarı Ş. Carious Exposure versus Mechanical Exposure for MTA Pulpotomy in Primary Teeth. Biomed Res Int. 2016; 2016: 2753429. [PMC free article] [PubMed[Google Scholar]
4. American academy of pediatric dentistry: Guideline on pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. Reference manual. 2014;36:242–250. [Google Scholar]
5. Ranly DM, Garcia-Godoy F. Current and potential pulp therapies for primary and young permanent teeth. J Dent. 2000; 28: 153–161. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
6. Lewis B. Formaldehyde in dentistry: a review for the millennium. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1998; 22: 167–177. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
7. Hildesheim A, Dosemeci M, Chan CC, Chen CJ, Cheng YJ, Hsu MM, et al. Occupational exposure to wood, formaldehyde, and solvents and risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001; 10: 1145–1153. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
8. Hauptmann M, Lubin JH, Stewart PA, Hayes RB, Blair A. Mortality from lymphohematopoietic malignancies among workers in formaldehyde industries. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003; 95: 1615–1623. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
9. Fernandes KPS, Santos EM, Reda SH, Motta LJ, Bussadori SK, Teixeira VP, et al. Biocompatibility of MTA, Portland cement and modified Portland cement on cultured fibroblast cells and subcutaneous tissue. ConScientiae Saude. 2010; 9: 11–16. [Google Scholar]
10. Solanki NP, Venkappa KK, Shah NC. Biocompatibility and sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and biodentine as root-end filling material: A systematic review. J Conserv Dent. 2018; 21: 10–15. [PMC free article] [PubMed[Google Scholar]
11. Bramante CM, Kato MM, Assis GF, Duarte MA, Bernardineli N, Moraes IG, et al. Biocompatibility and setting time of CPM-MTA and white Portland cement clinker with or without calcium sulfate. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013; 21: 32–36. [PMC free article] [PubMed[Google Scholar]
12. Ha WN, Nicholson T, Kahler B, Walsh LJ. Mineral Trioxide Aggregate-A Review of Properties and Testing Methodologies. Materials (Basel) 2017; 10: E1261. [PMC free article] [PubMed[Google Scholar]
13. Simancas-Pallares MA, Díaz-Caballero AJ, Luna-Ricardo LM. Mineral trioxide aggregate in primary teeth pulpotomy. A systematic literature review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010; 15: e942–e946. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
14. Chng HK, Islam I, Yap AU, Tong YW, Koh ET. Properties of a new root-end filling material. J Endod. 2005; 31: 665–668. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
15. Abdullah R, Pitt Ford TR, Papaioannou S, Nicholson J, McDonald F. An evaluation of accelerated Portland cement as a restorative material. Biomaterials. 2002;23:4001–4010. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
16. Antunes Bortoluzzi E, Juárez Broon N, Antonio Hungaro Duarte M, de Oliveira Demarchi AC, Monteiro Bramante C. The use of a setting accelerator and its effect on pH and calcium ion release of mineral trioxide aggregate and white Portland cement. J Endod. 2006; 32: 1194–1197. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
17. Ding SJ, Kao CT, Shie MY, Hung C Jr, Huang TH. The physical and cytological properties of white MTA mixed with Na2HPO4 as an accelerant. J Endod. 2008; 34: 748–751. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
18. Bortoluzzi EA, Broon NJ, Bramante CM, Felippe WT, Tanomaru Filho M, Esberard RM. The influence of calcium chloride on the setting time, solubility, disintegration, and pH of mineral trioxide aggregate and white Portland cement with a radiopacifier. J Endod. 2009; 35: 550–554. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
19. McNamara RP, Henry MA, Schindler WG, Hargreaves KM. Biocompatibility of accelerated mineral trioxide aggregate in a rat model. J Endod. 2010; 36: 1851–1855. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
20. Lee BN, Hwang YC, Jang JH, Chang HS, Hwang IN, Yang SY, et al. Improvement of the properties of mineral trioxide aggregate by mixing with hydration accelerators. J Endod. 2011; 37: 1433–1436. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
21. Kang JY, Lee BN, Son HJ, Koh JT, Kang SS, Son HH, et al. Biocompatibility of mineral trioxide aggregate mixed with hydration accelerators. J Endod. 2013; 39: 497–500. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
22. Lotfi M, Vosoughhosseini S, Saghiri MA, Mesgariabbasi M, Ranjkesh B. Effect of white mineral trioxide aggregate mixed with disodium hydrogen phosphate on inflammatory cells. J Endod. 2009; 35: 703–705. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
23. Martínez Lalis R, Esaín ML, Kokubu GA, Willis J, Chaves C, Grana DR. Rat subcutaneous tissue response to modified Portland cement, a new mineral trioxide aggregate. Braz Dent J. 2009; 20: 112–117. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
24. Shahi S, Rahimi S, Lotfi M, Yavari HR, Gaderian AR. A comparative study of the biocompatibility of three root-end filling materials in rat connective tissue. Journal of Endodontics. 2006; 32: 776–780. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
25. Ber BS, Hatton JF, Stewart GP. Chemical modification of proroot mta to improve handling characteristics and decrease setting time. J Endod. 2007; 33: 1231–1234. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
26. Mutoh N, Tani-Ishii N. A biocompatible model for evaluation of the responses of rat periapical tissue to a new zinc oxide-eugenol sealer. Dent Mater J. 2011; 30: 176–182. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
27. Yaltirik M, Ozbas H, Bilgic B, Issever H. Reactions of connective tissue to mineral trioxide aggregate and amalgam. J Endod. 2004; 30: 95–99. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
28. Bortoluzzi EA, Broon NJ, Bramante CM, Garcia RB, de Moraes IG, Bernardineli N. Sealing ability of MTA and radiopaque Portland cement with or without calcium chloride for root-end filling. J Endod. 2006; 32: 897–900. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
29. Yavari H, Shahi SH, Rahimi S, Shakouhi SL. Connective tissue reaction to white and gray MTA mixed with distilled water or chlorhexidine in rats. Iranian Endodontic Journal. 2009; 4:25–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed[Google Scholar]
30. Aminozarbian MG, Barati M, Salehi I, Mousavi SB. Biocompatibility of mineral trioxide aggregate and three new endodontic cements: An animal study. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2012; 9: 54–59. [PMC free article] [PubMed[Google Scholar]
31. Escobar-García DM, Aguirre-López E, Méndez-González V, Pozos-Guillén A. Cytotoxicity and Initial Biocompatibility of Endodontic Biomaterials (MTA and Biodentine™) Used as Root-End Filling Materials. Biomed Res Int. 2016; 2016: 7926961. [PMC free article] [PubMed[Google Scholar]
32. Sánchez AF, Leco-Berrocal MI, Martinez-Gonzalez JM. Metaanalysis of filler materials in periapical surgery. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008; 13:E180 –E185. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
33. Holland R, de Souza V, Nery MJ, Faraco Júnior IM, Bernabé PF, Otoboni Filho JA, et al. Reaction of rat connective tissue to implanted dentin tube filled with mineral trioxide aggregate, Portland cement or calcium hydroxide. Braz Dent J. 2001; 12: 3–8. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
34. Guimarães LF, Fidalgo TK, Menezes GC, Primo LG, Costa e Silva-Filho F. Effects of citric acid on cultured human osteoblastic cells. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010; 110: 665–669. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
35. Lee BN, Kim HJ, Chang HS, Hwang IN, Oh WM, Kim JW, et al. Effects of mineral trioxide aggregate mixed with hydration accelerators on osteoblastic differentiation. J Endod. 2014; 40: 2019–2023. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
36. Ji DY, Wu HD, Hsieh SC, Teng NC, Chen CC, Ke ES, et al. Effects of a novel hydration accelerant on the biological and mechanical properties of white mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2011; 37: 851–855. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
37. Orrenius S, Zhivotovsky B, Nicotera P. Regulation of cell death: the calcium-apoptosis link. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003; 4: 552–565. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
38. Midy V, Dard M, Hollande E. Evaluation of the effect of three calcium phosphate powders on osteoblast cells. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2001; 12: 259–265. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
39. Parirokh M, Asgary S, Eghbal MJ, Kakoei S, Samiee M. A comparative study of using a combination of calcium chloride and mineral trioxide aggregate as the pulp-capping agent on dogs' teeth. J Endod. 2011; 37: 786–788. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
40. Kulan P, Karabiyik O, Kose GT, Kargul B. Biocompatibility of Accelerated Mineral Trioxide Aggregate on Stem Cells Derived from Human Dental Pulp. J Endod. 2016; 42: 276–279. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
41. İlker A, Sarıyılmaz E, Çakici F. Does Adding Various Accelerators to Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Have a Negatively Effect on Push-Out Bond Strength? . Med Princ Pract. 2019;28:36–40. [PMC free article] [PubMed[Google Scholar]
42. Alqedairi A, Muñoz-Viveros CA, Pantera EA, Campillo-Funollet M, Alfawaz H, Neel A, et al. Superfast Set, Strong and Less Degradable Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Cement. International journal of dentistry . 2017;3019136:1–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed[Google Scholar]
43. Prasad A, Pushpa Sh, Arunagiri D, Sawhny A, Misra A, Sujatha R. A comparative evaluation of the effect of various additives on selected physical properties of white mineral trioxide aggregate. Journal of Conservative Dentistry. 2015; 18: 237–241. [PMC free article] [PubMed[Google Scholar]