Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Oral and Dental Diseases Research Center, Dept. of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

2 Post Graduate Student, Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

3 Dept. of Medicine of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

4 Associate professor,Pediatric Department, Division of Pediatric Hematology and oncology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

5 Dep.t of Pediatric, Division of Pediatric Hematology and oncology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

6 Dental Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Abstract

Statement of the Problem: Patients with leukemia are prone to infectious and often life-threatening complications. Evidence suggests that a specific oral microbiota may contribute to septicemia, which can delay antineoplastic treatment, compromise treatment efficacy, or even endanger patients' lives
Purpose: This study investigated the prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the saliva of patients with acute myeloid leukemia who were candidates for bone marrow transplantation.
Materials and Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2019 in the Hematology-Oncology Department of Namazi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. The study included 28 patients with acute myeloid leukemia eligible for bone marrow transplantation as the case group and age- and sex-matched healthy individuals as the control group. Unstimulated saliva samples were collected to determine the frequency of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 18, the chi-square test, and the independent t-test.
Results: In the patients with acute myeloid leukemia, 26 (86%) were positive for Staph-ylococcus aureus and 18 (60%) were positive for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In the healthy group, 11 (22.9%) were positive for Staphylococcus aureus and 3 (6.2%) were positive for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The frequency of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus in the saliva samples of patients with acute myeloid leukemia was significantly higher than in the healthy control subjects (p value < 0.05). Chi-square test showed no significant association between age and the frequency of bacteria (p value= 0.27).
Conclusion: In the current study, the frequency of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the saliva of patients with acute myeloid leukemia was higher than in the healthy control group.

Highlights

Fatemeh Lavaee (Google Scholar)

Keywords

Introduction

Malignant neoplasms, including hematopoietic dyscrasias, are an important cause of death in many countries [ 1 ]. Acute leukemia is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell dyscrasia of malignant cells with uncontrolled growth or failure of differentiation, classified according to myeloid or lymphoid origin. In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), there is an accumulation of poorly differentiated and nonfunctional myeloblasts, the specific cause of which is usually unknown in various patients [ 2 ].

Patients with leukemia are typically prone to infectious or hemorrhagic and often life-threatening complications [ 3 ]. The oral cavity contains several species of microflora that are harmless in healthy individuals. Since some of these flora species are opportunistic, an impaired immune response in cancer patients provides the prerequisite for them to become pathogens. The immune response is disturbed by the patients neoplasm and the treatments prescribed to them, including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and bone marrow transplantation. The disturbed homeostasis may affect the integrity of the oral mucosa, providing a suitable condition for opportunistic infections and their spread, leading to a life-threatening condition [ 4 ]. The oral cavity is a reservoir for pathogenic organisms that can cause microbial spread to distant body sites in immunocompromised hosts [ 5 ]. Staphylococcus aureus is a facultative aerobic, gram-positive bacterium responsible for skin, bone, and joint infections, medical implants, and food poisoning [ 6 ]. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a rod-shaped, encapsulated, facultative aerobic, gram-negative bacterium [ 7 ]. This species is of great medical importance [ 8 ] because it is opportunistic for healthy individuals and a pathogen for immunocompromised patients [ 9 ]. Pseudomonas aeruginosa promotes the highest mortality rate in patients with neutropenia and those have received bone marrow transplantation [ 10 ]. In addition, Pseudomonas aeruginosa is frequently isolated in post-transplant pneumonia [ 11 ]. Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are two dangerous opportunistic bacteria that can lead to mucositis and hospital-acquired infections [ 12 ].

Studies have shown that the oral microbial flora changes qualitatively in cancer patients [ 13 ]. Higher prevalence of cariogenic oral microflora, including Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus, as well as higher plaque index and severe oral inflammation in patients undergoing chemotherapy has been reported [ 14 ]. Staphylococci have been introduced as a cause of systemic infections in children with malignancies [ 15 ]. In studies, different bacterial species were isolated from lymphoma patients who had received chemotherapy. This study confirmed that hospitalized patients with leukemia and lymphoma might be frequently infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa [ 16 ].

While there are many reports of the increased prevalence and pathogenicity of the oral microbiota and the increasing risk of antibiotic resistance, the local epidemiologic studies of bacterial infections in immunocompromised patients, including AML, may influence the approach to antibiotic treatment, prophylaxis, and infection management. Inadequate infection control and its side effects may compromise the efficacy of cancer treatment and delay the antineoplastic protocol [ 17 ].

Considering the pathogenicity and multidrug resistance of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, this study was conducted to determine the frequency of these bacteria in the saliva of patients with acute AML who are candidates for bone marrow transplantation.

Materials and Method

This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2019 in the Hematology-Oncology Department of Namazi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran (code IR.SUMS. DENTAL.REC.1398.122), and was designed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration [ 18 ]. Twenty-eight patients with AML who were eligible for bone marrow transplantation and hospitalized in the Hematology-Oncology Department of Namazi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, participated in this study (Group 1). In addition, 48 healthy control subjects (Group 2) were selected from individuals who had been referred to Shiraz Dental School. Participants with severe periodontal disease (clinical attachment loss of more than 5 mm) [ 19 ], smokers and patients under radiotherapy or chemotherapy were excluded from the study. AML patients with other immunosuppressive and autoimmune diseases and patients under 18 years of age were also excluded. In the case and control groups, teeth were brushed at least once a day. Participants with autoimmune diseases or immunosuppressive conditions were excluded from the healthy control group. Patients in both the case and control groups had not used antimicrobials or mouth rinses for at least two weeks prior to saliva collection. The study protocol was explained to both groups, and participants provided written informed consents.

Participants were not allowed to eat or drink for 1 hour before sample collection. Saliva samples were collected from 28 patients with AML who were eligible for bone marrow transplantation as the case group and from 48 age-matched healthy volunteers as the control group. Saliva samples were collected for detection of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Spitting is a method of saliva collection in which saliva is collected from the floor of the mouth and then spit into a container equipped with a measuring device, such as a funnel linked to a tube/container. This method minimizes the evaporation of saliva in long-term samples and it can be employed when saliva flow is very low; though, it might have stimulatory effects. Subjects were instructed to spit saliva into sterile Falcon tubes containing 3 ml of thioglycollate broth [ 20 ]. Saliva samples were immediately sent to the microbiology laboratory under cold chain conditions and cultured on eosin methylene blue agar (EMB) to select gram-negative bacteria, which were incubated at 37°C for 24 to 48 hours. Bacteria colonies (different colonies per sample) were centrifuged at 17000 g (12500 rpm) for 10 minutes. The supernatant was discarded, and the deposit was resuspended in 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline to obtain a concentrated suspension. Using the standard strip plate method, a loop full of concentrated suspension was inoculated onto EMB, McConkey's agar culture medium (Germany). All culture plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours, and bacterial growth was observed as pink and white colored colonies. Colonies were primarily identified using the API 20E system according to the manufacturer's protocol (BioMerieux® SA, France). The API20E strip was used for the identification of gram-negative rods. All glycerol samples were aliquoted without dilution and stored at -80°C until molecular assays were performed. The presence of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was examined. All data were analyzed using SPSS version 18; the chi-square test was used to compare the abundance of these two bacteria. An independent t-test was also used to compare the mean age of the two groups.

Results

In this study, 48 saliva samples from healthy controls and 28 patients with AML who were candidates for bone marrow transplantation were examined. The mean age of the healthy controls and patients with AML was 33.56±12.45 years, and that of the cases was 30.36±17 years. The independent-samples test showed no significant difference between the ages of the two groups (p value= 0.35). The sex distribution is shown in Table 1. The frequency of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa is shown in Table 2.

Groups (N) Sex Frequency Present
Healthy Control (48) Female 30 62.5%
Male 18 37.5%
Patients with AML (28) Female 14 50%
Male 14 50%
Table 1.Sex distribution in both evaluated groups
Staphylococcus aureus Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Positive Negative Positive Negative
Case 26 2 18 10
Control 11 37 3 45
p value 0.001 0.0001
Table 2.The frequency of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in both evaluated groups

The frequency of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the saliva samples of AML patients was significantly higher than in the healthy controls. The chi-square test showed a significant difference between bacterial infections in both groups (p value < 0.05). Chi-square test revealed no significant association between age and bacterial frequency (p value=0.27).

Discussion

In the current study, the frequency of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was higher in AML than in the healthy control group (p< 0.05), consistent with the results of previous studies. A mini-review reported that despite fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in neutropenic patients, bacteremic episodes caused by Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa occurred in patients receiving HCT [ 22 ]. Al-kuhla et al. [ 23 ] isolated Staphylococcus aureus from the saliva of lymphoma patients receiving chemotherapy. In debilitated patients, the oral cavity can be a reservoir for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Eduardo et al. [ 24 ] reported that antibiotic-resistant oral ulcers contribute to Pseudomonas aeruginosa in these patients. Staphylococcus aureus causes bacteremia in 9-10% of adults with malignancies, with a mortality rate of 15-24%; the mortality rate for Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia is approximately 49.5% in cancer patients [ 25 ]. A systematic review evaluated the oral microbiota of patients undergoing chemotherapy for cancer in 17 studies, listing the most common bacteria. Pseudomonas spp. and Staphylococcus spp. were the most frequently observed bacteria in this list, along with several other spices [ 26 ]. The same study was performed on 13 clinical trials with 300 patients suffering from different types of cancer, and Pseudomonas spp. and Staphylococcus spp. were in the list of the most frequently isolated gram-negative and gram-positive species, respectively [ 27 ].

Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and some other pathogens were more frequently isolated from the saliva of patients with oral cancer [ 27 ].

In another study, a significant increase in Candida spp. and coagulase-negative Staphylococci was observed during the treatment phase of immunocompromised patients with hematologic malignancies, while Streptococci showed no change compared to other treatment phases [ 28 ]. Al-kuhla et al. [ 23 ] observed a higher prevalence of staphylococci during chemotherapy in lymphoma patients. Worldwide, many patients undergo hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) [ 29 ]. In recent years, the need for improved oral hygiene in cancer patients is confirmed [ 30 ]. In the past, the treatment of transplant cases was not part of dental education. Evidence has confirmed the correlation between oral microflora and systemic diseases [ 31 ]. It is recommended to inform the patients about the adverse effects of HCT on the oral mucosa prior conditioning. This encourages them to consider oral prophylaxis and to pay careful attention to oral hygiene. According to reports in the literature, only 30% of bone marrow transplant recipients are educated about oral hygiene prior to their transplant [ 32 ]. Bone marrow transplantation is one of the treatment options for AML patients. Since AML patients are immunosuppressed, they are more susceptible to bacterial and fungal infections, severe bacteremia, and various systemic dangerous and life-threatening infections, which can be treated by eliminating the microbial load. The recommended protocols for all bone marrow candidates are oral hygiene education, dental examination, and treatment prior to initiation of therapy. Immunocompromised patients, including HCT candidates, should improve their oral hygiene with regular rinsing with normal saline or sodium bicarbonate solution, tooth brushing, and atraumatic flossing. Microbial screening in hospitalized patients with hematopoietic malignancies at various stages of treatment is recommended [ 33 ].

Patient recruitment in our study was hampered by limited funding. Patient cooperation was low.

A larger sample size is recommended to obtain more accurate assessments. Because the emphasis on hygiene recommendations in treatment protocols for immunocompromised patients or patients eligible for bone marrow transplantation is not the same in different countries, this may be an important issue for future evaluations. In addition, access to other oral pathogens in patients with other types of malignancies is suggested.

Conclusion

The incidence of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was significantly higher in AML patients who were candidates for bone marrow transplantation than in healthy participants. This finding confirms the importance of improved oral hygiene in patients with leukemia.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the vice-chancellery of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences for supporting the research. This manuscript has been extracted from the thesis of Dr. Amir Hossein Ojaghi with grant number 20060.

Funding

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (grant number 20060) has supported this manuscript.

Ethics approval

Ethics approval has been obtained from Shiraz University of Medical Sciences with letter number (IR. SUMS. DENTAL. REC. 1398. 122) dated 2019.11.03

Conflict of Interest:

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: Globocan Estimates of Incidence and Mortality World wide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71: 209-249.
  2. Sorror ML, Storer BE, Nyland J, Estey EH. Revised acute myeloid leukemia composite model using the 2017 European LeukemiaNet risk classification. JAMA Oncol. 2019; 5: 1062-1064.
  3. Taicz M, Pérez MG, Reijtman V, Mastroianni A, Escarra F, García ME, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors for prolonged hospital length of stay in children with leukemia and bacteremia. Cohort study. Rev Chilena Infectol. 2018; 35: 233-238.
  4. Shi W, Tian J, Xu H, Zhou Q, Qin M. Distinctions and associations between the microbiota of saliva and supragingival plaque of permanent and deciduous teeth. PLoS One. 2018; 13: e0200337.
  5. Graves DT, Corrêa JD, Silva TA. The oral microbiota is modified by systemic diseases. J Dent Res. 2019; 98: 148-156.
  6. Ndlovu KCZ, Swe Swe-Han K, Assounga A. Association of staphylococcus nasal colonization and HIV in end-stage renal failure patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis. Ren Fail. 2019; 41: 303-313.
  7. Pitt TL, Simpson AJ. Principles and Practice of Clinical Bacteriology. John Wiley and Sons: Chichester; 2006.
  8. Diggle SP, Whiteley M. Microbe Profile: Pseudomonas aeruginosa: opportunistic pathogen and lab rat. Microbiology. 2020; 166: 30.
  9. Qin S, Xiao W, Zhou C, Pu Q, Deng X, Lan L, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: pathogenesis, virulence factors, antibiotic resistance, interaction with host, technology advances and emerging therapeutics. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022; 7: 199.
  10. Satlin MJ, Walsh TJ. Multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus: Three major threats to hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2017; 19: 10.1111/tid.12762. DOI
  11. Kulkarni HS, Tsui K, Sunder S, Ganninger A, Tague LK, Witt CA, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and acute rejection independently increase the risk of donor-specific antibodies after lung transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2020; 20: 1028-1038.
  12. Collin BA, Leather HL, Wingard JR, Ramphal R. Evolution, incidence, and susceptibility of bacterial bloodstream isolates from 519 bone marrow transplant patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2001; 33: 947-953.
  13. Olszewska K, Mielnik-Błaszczak M. An assessment of the number of cariogenic bacteria in the saliva of children with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2016; 25: 11-19.
  14. Vozza I, Caldarazzo V, Ottolenghi L. Changes in microflora in dental plaque from cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy and the relationship of these changes with mucositis: A pilot study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015; 20: e259-e266.
  15. Jackson MS. Staphylococci in the oral flora of healthy children and those receiving treatment for malignant disease. Microbial Ecol Health and Dis. 2000; 12: 60-64.
  16. Schimpff SC, Greene WH, Young VM, Wiernik PH. Significance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the patient with leukemia or lymphoma. J Infect Dis. 1974; 130(Supplement): S24-S31.
  17. Balletto E, Mikulska M. Bacterial infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2015; 7: e2015045.
  18. Association WM. World medical association declaration of Helsinki. Available at: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index html.
  19. Relvas M, López-Jarana P, Monteiro L, Pacheco JJ, Braga AC, Salazar F. Study of Prevalence, Severity and Risk Factors of Periodontal Disease in a Portuguese Population. J Clin Med. 2022; 11: 3728.
  20. Bellagambi FG, Lomonaco T, Salvo P, Vivaldi F, Hangouët M, Ghimenti S, et al. Saliva sampling: methods and devices. An Overview. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem.  2020; 124: 115781.
  21. Gooch JW. Encyclopedic Dictionary of Polymers. Springer New York: New York, NY; 2011.
  22. Bogusławska-Kapała A, Hałaburda K, Rusyan E, Gołąbek H, Strużycka I. Oral health of adult patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation. Pre-transplant assessment and care. Ann Hematol. 2017; 96: 1135-1145.
  23. Al-Kuhla HWA, Al-Aswad FD. Oral manifestations, microbial study and salivary IgA study in lymphoma patients receiving chemotherapy. J Baghdad Coll Dent. 2011; 23: 56-60.
  24. Eduardo FdP, Bezinelli LM, Gobbi M, Santos V, Maluf F, Corrêa L. Severe oral infection caused by Pseudomon as aeruginosa effectively treated with methylene bluem-ediated photodynamic inactivation. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2019; 26: 284-286.
  25. Kang CK, Kwak YG, Park Y, Song KH, Kim ES, Jung SI, et al. Gender affects prognosis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia differently depending on the severity of underlying disease. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018; 37: 1119-1123.
  26. Villafuerte KRV, Martinez CdJH, Dantas FT, Carrara HHA, Dos Reis FJC, Palioto DB. The impact of chemotherapeutic treatment on the oral microbiota of patients with cancer: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radio. 2018; 125: 552-566.
  27. Napeñas JJ, Brennan MT, Bahrani-Mougeot FK, Fox PC, Lockhart PB. Relationship between mucositis and changes in oral microflora during cancer chemotherapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Patho Oral Radio Endo. 2007; 103: 48-59.
  28. Mathews J, Patel M. Bacterial endotoxins and microorganisms in the oral cavities of patients on cancer therapy. Microb Pathog. 2018; 123:190-5.
  29. Wingard JR, Majhail NS, Brazauskas R, Wang Z, Sobocinski KA, Jacobsohn D, et al. Long-term survival and late deaths after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29: 2230.
  30. Georgakopoulou EA, Achtari MD, Afentoulide N. Dental management of patients before and after renal transplantation. Stomatologija. 2011; 13: 107-112.
  31. Párkányi L, Vályi P, Nagy K, Fráter M. Odontogenic foci and systemic diseases: A review. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159: 415-422.
  32. Laheij AM, de Soet JJ, von dem Borne PA, Kuijper EJ, Kraneveld EA, van Loveren C, et al. Oral bacteria and yeasts in relationship to oral ulcerations in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Support Care Cancer. 2012; 20: 3231-3240.
  33. Mawardi H, Treister N, Felemban O, Alamoudi W, Algohary G, Alsultan A, et al. Current practice of oral care for hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients: A survey of the Eastern Mediterranean Blood and Marrow transplantation group. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2023; 16: 42-51.