Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Dept. of Endodontology, Endodontology Research Center, Neuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

2 Dept. of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Shahid Bahonar University, Kerman, Iran.

3 Endodontology Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

4 Neuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

5 Dept. of Maxillofacial Radiology, Kerman School of Dentistry, Kerman, Iran.

6 Oral and Dental Diseases Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

Abstract

Statement of the Problem: The goal of endodontic therapy is the reduction or elimination of microorganisms from the root canal system. The use of intracanal medicament between treatment appointments is recommended in order to eliminate any remainang microorganisms in the pulp space.
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to investigate the antimicrobial activity of methanolic extracts of Myrtus communisL. and Eucalyptus galbie, their combination with calcium hydroxide powder; combination of calcium hydroxide powder with water, and ready-to-use calcium hydroxide paste with iodoform; against Enterococcus faecalis.
Materials and Method: In this experimental study, after gathering the plants, their methanolic extracts were obtained by masceration method. The diameters of inhibition zone of all mentioned materials were determined by agar diffusion test. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC); and anti biofilm effect of the materials that showed antibacterial effect in agar diffusion test, were then evaluated by tube dilution test, and microtiter plate assay followed by colorimetric crystal violet methods, respectively.
Results: After 48 hours, both herbal extracts showed antimicrobial effect. However, combination of calcium hydroxide with extracts produced no zone of inhibition. The mean inhibition zone of Eucalyptus extract was more than that of Myrtus. However, the results of ANOVA test, showed that there was no significant difference between the antibacterial effect of Eucalyptus galbie, Myrtus communisL. and positive control (Cefoxitin) (p Value= 0.987). The MIC for both extracts were 12.5 mg/ml. MBC evaluation of the two methanolic extracts showed no bactericidal effect on Enterococcus faecalis. Based on ELISA analysis, biofilm formation in response to different sub-MIC concentrations of both extracts was scored as weak to moderate.
Conclusion: The methanolic extracts of Eucalyptus galbie and Myrtus communis L. in combination with calcium hydroxide powder were not able to eliminate Enterococcus faecalis within 48 hours.

Keywords

1. Siqueira JF Jr. Endodontic infections: concepts, paradigms, and perspectives. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002; 94: 281–293. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
2. Costerton JW. Cystic fibrosis pathogenesis and the role of biofilms in persistent infection. Trends Microbiol. 2001; 9: 50–52. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
3. Gilbert P1, Das J, Foley I. Biofilm susceptibility to antimicrobials. Adv Dent Res. 1997; 11: 160–167. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
4. Stewart PS, Costerton JW. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet. 2001; 358: 135–138. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
5. Bystrom A, Sundqvist G. The antibacterial action of sodium hypochlorite and EDTA in 60 cases of endodontic therapy. Int Endod J. 1985; 18: 35–40. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
6. Laplace JM, Thuault M, Hartke A, Boutibonnes P, Auffray Y. Sodium hypochlorite stress in Enterococcus faecalis: influence of antecedent growthconditions and induced proteins. Curr Microbiol. 1997; 34: 284–289. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
7. Lambrianidis T, Kosti E, Boutsioukis C, Mazinis M. Removal efficacy of various calcium hydroxide/ chlorhexidine medicaments from the root canal. Int Endod J. 2006; 39: 55–61. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
8. Barnett F, Trope M, Khoja M, Tronstad L. Bacteriologic status of the root canal after sonic, ultrasonic and hand instrumentation. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1985; 1: 228–231. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
9. Sjögren U, Figdor D, Spångberg L, Sundqvist G. The antimicrobial effect of calcium hydroxide as a short-term intracanal dressing. Int Endod J. 1991; 24: 119–125. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
10. Nerwich A, Figdor D, Messer HH. pH changes in root dentin over a 4-week period following root canal dressing with calcium hydroxide. J Endod. 1993; 19: 302–306. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
11. Haapasalo HK, Sirén EK, Waltimo TM, Ørstavik D, Haapasalo MP. Inactivation of local root canal medicaments by dentine: an in vitro study. Int Endod J. 2000; 33: 126–131. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
12. Evans M, Davies JK, Sundqvist G, Figdor D. Mechanisms involved in the resistance of Enterococcus faecalis to calcium hydroxide. Int Endod J. 2002; 35: 221–228. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
13. Waltimo TM, Orstavik D, Sirén EK, Haapasalo MP. In vitro susceptibility of Candida albicans to four disinfectants and their combinations. Int Endod J. 1999; 32: 421–429. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
14. Portenier I, Waltimo TM, Haapasalo M. Enterococcus faecalis- The root canal survivor and ‘star’ in post treatment disease. Endod Topics. 2003; 6:135–159. [Google Scholar]
15. Stuart CH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ, Owatz CB. Enterococcus faecalis: its role in root canal treatment failure and current concepts in retreatment. J Endod. 2006; 32: 93–98. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
16. Sunde PT, Olsen I, Debelian GJ, Tronstad L. Microbiota of periapical lesions refractory to endodontic therapy. J Endod. 2002; 28: 304–310. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
17. Love RM. Enterococcus faecalis--a mechanism for its role in endodontic failure. Int Endod J. 2001; 34: 399–405. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
18. Cwikla SJ, Bélanger M, Giguère S, Progulske-Fox A, Vertucci FJ. Dentinal tubule disinfection using three calcium hydroxide formulations. J Endod. 2005; 31: 50–52. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
19. Siqueira JF Jr, Paiva SS, Rôças IN. Reduction in the cultivable bacterial populations in infected root canals by a chlorhexidine-based antimicrobial protocol. J Endod. 2007; 33: 541–547. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
20. Schäfer E, Bössmann K. Antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine and two calcium hydroxide formulations againstEnterococcus faecalis. J Endod. 2005; 31: 53–56. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
21. Haghighati F, Jafari S, Beitollahi J. Comparison of antimicrobial effects of ten Herbal extracts with chlrohexidine on three different oral pathogens. An in vitro study. Hakim Res J . 2003; 6: 71–76. [Google Scholar]
22. WHO Guidelines on Good Agricultural and Collection Practices (GACP) for Medicinal Plants. Available at: [http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/d/Js4928e/ ]
23. Yadegarinia D, Gachkar L, Rezaei MB, Taghizadeh M, Astaneh SA, Rasooli I. Biochemical activities of Iranian Mentha piperita L. and Myrtus communis L. essential oils. Phytochemistry. 2006; 67: 1249–1255. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
24. Zargari A. Medicinal plants. 6th ed. Focal Press: Tehran University Publications; 1995. pp. 290–301. [Google Scholar]
25. Nourzadeh M, Amini A, Fakoor F, Raoof M, Sharififar F. Comparative Antimicrobial Efficacy of Eucalyptus Galbie and Myrtus Communis L.Extracts, Chlorhexidine and Sodium Hypochlorite against Enterococcus Faecalis. Iran Endod J. 2017; 12: 205–210. [PMC free article] [PubMed[Google Scholar]
26. Alizadeh Behbahani B, Tabatabaei Yazdi F, Noorbakhsh H, Riazi F, Jajarmi A, Tabatabaei Yazdi F. Study of the Antibacterial Activity of Methanolic and Aqueous Extracts of Myrtus communis on Pathogenic Strains Causing Infection. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2016; 18: e5989. [Google Scholar]
27. Mert T, Fafal T, Kivcak B, Ozturk HT. Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Activities of Myrtus Communis L. J Fac Pharm. 2008; 37: 191–199. [Google Scholar]
28. Momeni T, Aghsani P, Rohani N. Herbal extracts. 1th ed. Shahid Farhad Reza Publication: Tehran; 2000. pp. 34–50. [Google Scholar]
29. Mortazavi SH, Azadmard Damirchi S, Sowti M, Mahmudi R, Safaeean F, Moradi Azad S. Antimicrobial effects ofethanolic extract of the hull and the core of Pistacia Khinjuk stocks. Innovative Food Technologies. 2014; 1: 81–88. [Google Scholar]
30. Habibipour R, Moradi Haghgou L. Study on Hydro-Alcoholic Extract Effect of Pomegranate Peel on Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Formation. Avicenna J Clin Med. 2015; 22: 195–202. [Google Scholar]
31. Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Vianna ME, Rosalen PL, Zaia AA, Teixeira FB, et al. In vitro antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide pastes and their vehicles against selected microorganisms. Braz Dent J. 2002; 13: 155–161. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
32. Haapasalo M, Orstavik D. In vitro infection and disinfection of dentinal tubules. J Dent Res. 1987; 66: 1375–1379. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
33. Safavi KE, Spangberg LS, Langeland K. Root canal dentinal tubule disinfection. J Endod. 1990; 16: 207–210. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
34. Sathyaprasad S, Jose BK, Chandra HS. Antimicrobial and antifungal efficacy of Spilanthes acmella as an intracanal medicamentin comparison to calcium hydroxide: An in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2015; 26: 528–532. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
35. Gomes BP, Drucker DB, Lilley JD. Associations of specific bacteria with some endodontic signs and symptoms. Int Endod J. 1994; 27: 291–298. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
36. Portenier I, Haapasalo H, Rye A, Waltimo T, Ørstavik D, Haapasalo M. Inactivation of root canal medicaments by dentine, hydroxylapatite and bovine serum albumin. Int Endod J. 2001; 34: 184–188. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
37. Safavi K, Nakayama TA. Influence of mixing vehicle on dissociation of calcium hydroxide in solution. J Endod. 2000; 26: 649– 651. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
38. Siqueira JF Jr, de Uzeda M. Influence of different vehicles on the antibacterial effects of calcium hydroxide. J Endod. 1998; 24: 663–665. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
39. Fava LR, Saunders WP. Calcium hydroxide pastes: classification and clinical indications. Int Endod J. 1999; 32: 257–282. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
40. Zerella JA, Fouad AF, Spångberg LS. Effectiveness of a calcium hydroxide and chlorhexidine digluconate mixture as disinfectant during retreatment of failed endodontic cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005; 100: 756–761. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
41. Haenni S, Schmidlin PR, Mueller B, Sener B, Zehnder M. Chemical and antimicrobial properties of calcium hydroxide mixed with irrigatingsolutions. Int Endod J. 2003; 36: 100–105. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
42. Aminzadeh M, Amiri F, Abadi EA, Mahdevi K, Fadai S. Factors affecting on essential chemical composition of Thymus kotschyanus in Iran. World Applied Sci J. 2010;8:847–856. [Google Scholar]
43. Pamplona-Roger GD. Encyclopedia of Medicinal Plants Education and Health Library. Available at: [https://www.amazon.com/Encyclopedia-Medicinal-Plants-Education-Library/dp/8472081575. ]
44. Gomes BP, Souza SF, Ferraz CC, Teixeira FB, Zaia AA, Valdrighi L, et al. Effectiveness of 2% chlorhexidine gel and calcium hydroxide against Enterococcus faecalis in bovine root dentine in vitro. Int Endod J. 2003; 36: 267–275. [PubMed[Google Scholar]
45. Sedgley CM, Lennan SL, Appelbe OK. Survival of Enterococcus faecalis in root canals ex vivo. Int Endod J. 2005; 38: 735–742. [PubMed[Google Scholar]