Document Type : Systematic Review

Authors

1 Dept. of Operative Dentistry, Dental Materials Research Center, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

2 Dept. of Endodontics, Dental Research Center, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

3 Dept. of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Rafsanajn University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran

4 Dept. of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.

10.30476/dentjods.2023.97057.1986

Abstract

Statement of the Problem: Immediate dentin sealing (IDS) was introduced to overcome the disadvantages of delayed dentin sealing like pollution of dentin tubules, microleakage, and bond strength destruction over time. The effect of IDS on the bond strength of indirect restorations is still debatable.
Purpose: This study was conducted to determine the effect of IDS on the bond strength of ceramic restorations to dentin.
Materials and Method: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the study protocol was registered on the PROSPERO database under the registration number CRD420202014 27. MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest databases were searched until January 2021 and updated in January 2022. Worldcat.org and Opengrey.eu, ProQuest dissertation and thesis, and Google Scholar were searched to explore the grey literature. The in vitro studies evaluating the bond strength of ceramic restoration to dentin with and without IDS were included. Seven criteria were assessed to evaluate the risk of bias in the study. Statistical analyses were conducted using RevMan 5.3. The inverse variance method was used to determine the mean difference of micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) and shear bond strength (SBS).
Results: A total of 10 studies (20 datasets) were included in the meta-analysis. Regarding the µTBS analysis, IDS had a significantly higher bond strength than Delayed Dentin Sealing (DDS) (MD:1.16, 95%CI:0.28_2.03, I2=0%). However, no significant difference was found between them in the SBS analysis (MD:0.25, 95%CI: -0.56-1.06, I2=96%). All studies were categorized to have a moderate or high risk of bias.
Conclusion: Most in vitro evidence showed favorable results for the effect of IDS on the bond strength and durability of indirect restorations. The adhesive system and the type of ceramic and its treatment before cementation are determining factors. Due to the heterogeneity of the outcomes and studies with a moderate/high risk of bias, the quality of the evidence was low.

Keywords

  • Lutz F, Krejci I. Resin composites in the post-amalgam age. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry Jamesburg. NJ 1995. 1999; 20: 1138-1148.
  • Ritter AV, Walter R, Lee W. Boushell. Sturdevant’s art and science of operative dentistry. 7th ed. Elsevier Health Sciences: North Carolina; 2019. p. 220-221.
  • Breschi L. Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry: A contemporary approach. 4th ed. Quintessence Publishing: Chicago; 2013. p. 293.‏
  • Murata T, Maseki T, Nara Y. Effect of immediate dentin sealing applications on bonding of CAD/CAM ceramic onlay restoration. Dent Mater J. 2018; 76: 928-939.
  • Qanungo A, Aras MA, Chitre V, Mysore A, Amin B, Daswani SR. Immediate dentin sealing for indirect bonded restorations. J Prosthodont Res. 2016; 60: 240-249.
  • Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am J Dent. 2000; 13: 60D-76D.
  • Falkensammer F, Arnetzl GV, Wildburger A, Krall C, Freudenthaler J. Influence of different conditioning methods on immediate and delayed dentin sealing. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112: 204-210.
  • Shakal MAS. Evaluation of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic surface treatment on their shear bond strength to dentine following immediate dentin sealing. Egypt Dent J. 2017; 63: 3907-3913.
  • Vinagre A, Ralho A, Ramos N, Messias A, Ramos J. Bonding performance of a universal adhesive: Effect of hydrophobic resin coating and long-term water storage. Rev Port Estomatol Med Dentária Cir Maxilofac. 2019; 60: 96-103.
  • Rozan S, Takahashi R, Nikaido T, Tichy A, Tagami J. CAD/CAM-fabricated inlay restorations: Can the resin-coating technique improve bond strength and internal adaptation? Dent Mater J. 2020; 39: 941-949.
  • Pashley DH, Ciucchi B, Sano H, Horner JA. Permeability of dentin to adhesive agents. Quintessence Int. 1993; 24: 618-631.
  • Magne P, Kim TH, Cascione D, Donovan TE. Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strength of indirect restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 94: 511-519.
  • Rigos A, Dandoulaki C, Kontonasaki E, Kokoti M, Papadopoulou L, Koidis P. Effect of immediate dentin sealing on the bond strength of monolithic zirconia to human dentin. Oper Dent. 2019; 44: E167-E179.
  • Hironaka NG, Ubaldini AL, Sato F, Giannini M, Terada RS, Pascotto RC. Influence of immediate dentin sealing and interim cementation on the adhesion of indirect restorations with dual-polymerizing resin cement. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 119: 678.
  • Choi YS, Cho IH. An effect of immediate dentin sealing on the shear bond strength of resin cement to porcelain restoration. J Adv Prosthodont. 2010; 2: 39.
  • Hayashi K, Maeno M, Nara Y. Influence of immediate dentin sealing and temporary restoration on the bonding of CAD/CAM ceramic crown restoration. Dent Mater J. 2019; 38: 970-980.
  • Dalby R, Ellakwa A, Millar B, Martin FE. Influence of immediate dentin sealing on the shear bond strength of pressed ceramic luted to dentin with self-etch resin cement. Int J Dent. 2012; 2012. 310702.
  • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010; 8: 336-341.
  • Sarkis-Onofre R, Skupien J, Cenci M, Moraes R, Pereira-Cenci T. The role of resin cement on bond strength of glass-fiber posts luted into root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro Oper Dent. 2014; 39: E31-E44.
  • Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐ Stat Med. 2002; 21: 1539-1558.
  • Ishii N, Maseki T, Nara Y. Bonding state of metal-free CAD/CAM onlay restoration after cyclic loading with and without immediate dentin sealing. Dent Mater J. 2017; 36: 357-367.
  • Kitayama S, Pilecki P, Nasser NA, Bravis T, Wilson RF, Nikaido T, et al. Effect of resin coating on adhesion and microleakage of computer‐aided design/computer‐aided manufacturing fabricated all‐ceramic crowns after occlusal loading: a laboratory study. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009; 117: 454-462.
  • Reboul T, Thaï HH, Cetik S, Atash R. Comparison between shear forces applied on the overlay-dental tissue interface using different bonding techniques: An in vitro J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018; 18: 212.
  • Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing: a fundamental procedure for indirect bonded restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2005; 17: 144-154.
  • De Munck J, Vargas M, Iracki J, Van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, et al. One-day bonding effectiveness of new self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Oper Dent. 2005; 30: 39-49.
  • Armstrong SR, Vargas MA, Fang Q, Laffoon JE. Microtensile bond strength of a total-etch 3-step, total-etch 2-step, self-etch 2-step, and a self-etch 1-step dentin bonding system through 15-month water storage. J Adhes Dent. 2003; 5: 47-56.
  • Goracci C, Sadek FT, Monticelli F, Cardoso PE, Ferrari M. Influence of substrate, shape, and thickness on microtensile specimens’ structural integrity and their measured bond strengths. Dent Mater. 2004; 20: 643-654.
  • Poitevin A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Coutinho E, Peumans M, Lambrechtse P, et al. Critical analysis of the influence of different parameters on the microtensile bond strength of adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2008;10: 7-16.
  • Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater. 1995; 11: 117-125.
  • Gallusi G, Galeano P, Libonati A, Giuca MR, Campanella V. Evaluation of bond strength of different adhesive systems: Shear and Microtensile Bond Strength Test. Oral Implantol (Rome). 2009; 2: 19.
  • Takimoto M, Ishii R, Iino M, Shimizu Y, Tsujimoto A, Takamizawa T, et al. Influence of temporary cement contamination on the surface free energy and dentine bond strength of self-adhesive cements. J Dent. 2012; 40: 131-138.
  • Ribeiro JC, Coelho PG, Janal MN, Silva NR, Monteiro AJ, Fernandes CA. The influence of temporary cements on dental adhesive systems for luting cementation. J Dent. 2011; 39: 255-262.
  • Brigagão VC, Barreto LF, Gonçalves KA, Amaral M, Vitti RP, Neves AC, et al. Effect of interim cement application on bond strength between resin cements and dentin: Immediate and delayed dentin sealing. J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117: 792-798.
  • Papacchini F, Dall Oca S, Chieffi N, Goracci C, Sadek FT, Suh BI, et al. Composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength in the repair of a microfilled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatment and oxygen inhibition. J Adhes Dent. 2007; 9: 25.
  • Pamato S, do Valle AL. Does hybridized dentin affect bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement? J Clin Exp Dent. 2016; 8: e409.
  • Seemann R, Flury S, Pfefferkorn F, Lussi A, Noack MJ. Restorative dentistry and restorative materials over the next 20 years: a Delphi survey. Dent Mater. 2014; 30: 442-448.
  • Dietschi D, Monasevic M, Krejci I, Davidson C. Marginal and internal adaptation of class II restorations after immediate or delayed composite placement. J Dent. 2002; 30: 259-269.
  • Irie M, Suzuki K, Watts D. Marginal gap formation of light-activated restorative materials: effects of immediate setting shrinkage and bond strength. Dent Mater. 2002; 18: 203-210.
  • Cardenas AM, Siqueira F, Hass V, Malaquias P, Gutierrez MF, Reis A, et al. Effect of MDP-containing silane and adhesive used alone or in combination on the long-term bond strength and chemical interaction with lithium disilicate ceramics. J Adhes Dent. 2017; 19: 203-212.
  • Pott PC, Stiesch M, Eisenburger M. Influence of 10-MD-P adhesive system on shear bond strength of zirconia-composite interfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 4: 117-126.
  • Ito S, Hashimoto M, Wadgaonkar B, Svizero N, Carvalho RM, Yiu C, et al. Effects of resin hydrophilicity on water sorption and changes in modulus of elasticity. Biomaterials. 2005; 26: 6449-6459.
  • Magne P. IDS: Immediate Dentin Sealing (IDS) for tooth preparations. J Adhes Dent. 2014; 16: 594.
  • Malysa A, Wezgowiec J, Orzeszek S, Florjanski W, Zietek M, Wieckiewicz M. Effect of different surface treatment methods on bond strength of dental ceramics to dental hard tissues: A systematic review. Molecules. 2021; 26: 1223.
  • Bona AD, Borba M, Benetti P, Cecchetti D. Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of a zirconia-reinforced ceramic to composite resin. Braz Oral Res. 2007; 21: 10-15.
  • Magne P, Douglas WH. Rationalization of esthetic restorative dentistry based on biomimetics. J Esthet Rest Dent. 1999; 11: 5-15.
  • Magne P, Douglas WH. Porcelain veneers: Dentin bonding optimization and biomimetic recovery of the crown. Int J Prosthodont. 1999; 12: 111-121.
  • Rueggeberg F, Margeson D. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res. 1990; 69: 1652-1658.
  • Khakiani MI, Kumar V, Pandya HV, Nathani TI, Verma P, Bhanushali NV. Effect of immediate dentin sealing on polymerization of elastomeric materials: an ex vivo randomized controlled trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019;

12: 288.

  • Leesungbok R, Lee SM, Park SJ, Lee SW, Lee DY, Im BJ, et al. The effect of IDS (immediate dentin sealing) on dentin bond strength under various thermocycling periods. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015; 7: 224-232.
  • Elbishari H, Elsubeihi ES, Alkhoujah T, Elsubeihi HE. Substantial in vitro and emerging clinical evidence supporting immediate dentin sealing. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2021; 57: 101-110.
  • Magne P, Nielsen B. Interactions between impression materials and immediate dentin sealing. J Prosthet Dent. 2009; 102: 298-305.
  • Gresnigt MM, Cune MS, Schuitemaker J, van der Made SA, Meisberger EW, Magne P, et al. Performance of ceramic laminate veneers with immediate dentine sealing: An 11 year prospective clinical trial. Dent Mater. 2019; 35: 1042-1052.
  • Van den Breemer CR, Buijs GJ, Cune MS, Özcan M, Kerdijk W, Van der Made S, et al. Prospective clinical evaluation of 765 partial glass-ceramic posterior restorations luted using photo-polymerized resin composite in conjunction with immediate dentin sealing. Clin Oral Investig. 2021; 25: 1463-1473.