Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Dept. of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti Medical University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Endodontist, Dept. of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti Medical University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Endodontist, Private Practice, Tehran, Iran.

4 Postgraduate Student, Dept. of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti Medical University, Tehran, Iran.

10.30476/dentjods.2023.98119.2054

Abstract

Statement of the Problem: Successful endodontic treatment depends on three-dimensional (3D) root canal filling to prevent the leakage of residual bacteria. Different obturation techniques with different sealers should be compared by employing advanced assessment tools.
Purpose: This study compared the obturation quality of warm vertical compaction (WVC) and two different single-cone (SC) techniques using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).
Materials and Method: Thirty-three extracted maxillary molars with mesial root canal curvature of 20‒40º were prepared in vitro with One-Curve files and randomly assigned to three groups (n=11) for root canal obturation with WVC, SC technique with AH Plus sealer (SC-AH), or SC technique with SureSeal bioceramic (BC) sealer (SC-Su). The root canals underwent micro-CT examinations before and after obturation to determine the volume percentages (VPs) of voids and gaps at different distances from the apex (coronal, middle, and apical thirds). Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests.
Results: The highest VP of voids and gaps was recorded in the SC-Su group, with no significant difference from other groups (p> 0.05). There were significant differences in VP of gaps at different distances from the apex (p<0.05). The VPs of gaps in the apical third of all the samples were significantly higher than in the coronal and middle thirds. However, the difference in VP of voids was not significant at different distances from the apex (p>0.05).
Conclusion: None of the tested techniques could provide a void-free and gap-free filling. The apical third of the canals showed the highest VP of gaps in all obturation techniques.

Keywords

  • Li GH, Niu LN, Zhang W, Olsen M, De-Deus G, Eid AA, et al. Ability of new obturation materials to improve the seal of the root canal system: a review. Acta Biomater. 2014; 10: 1050-1063.
  • Keleş A, Keskin C. Presence of voids after warm vertical compaction and single-cone obturation in band-shaped isthmuses using micro-computed tomography: A phantom study. Microsc Res Tech. 2020; 83: 370-374.
  • Liang YH, Li G, Shemesh H, Wesselink PR, Wu MK. The association between complete absence of post-treatment periapical lesion and quality of root canal filling. Clin Oral Investig. 2012; 16: 1619-1626.
  • Ng YL, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K. Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature -- Part 2. Influence of clinical factors. Int Endod J. 2008; 41: 6-31.
  • De-Deus G, Souza EM, Silva E, Belladonna FG, Simões-Carvalho M, Cavalcante DM, et al. A critical analysis of research methods and experimental models to study root canal fillings. Int Endod J. 2022; 55 Suppl 2: 384-445.
  • Celikten B, Uzuntas CF, Orhan AI, Orhan K, Tufenkci P, Kursun S, et al. Evaluation of root canal sealer filling quality using a single-cone technique in oval shaped canals: An in vitro Micro-CT study. Scanning. 2016; 38: 133-140.
  • Pereira AC, Nishiyama CK, de*Castro*Pinto L. Single-cone obturation technique: a literature review. RSBO Revista Sul-Brasileira De Odontologia. 2012; 9: 442-447.
  • Tasdemir T, Yesilyurt C, Ceyhanli KT, Celik D, Er K. Evaluation of apical filling after root canal filling by 2 different techniques. J Can Dent Assoc. 2009; 75: 201a-201d.
  • Marciano MA, Ordinola-Zapata R, Cunha TV, Duarte MA, Cavenago BC, Garcia RB, et al. Analysis of four gutta-percha techniques used to fill mesial root canals of mandibular molars. Int Endod J. 2011; 44: 321-329.
  • Migliau G, Palaia G, Pergolini D, Guglielmelli T, Fascetti R, Sofan A, et al. Comparison of two root canal filling techniques: Obturation with guttacore carrier based system and obturation with guttaflow2 fluid gutta-percha. Dent J (Basel). 2022; 10: 71. 
  • Chybowski EA, Glickman GN, Patel Y, Fleury A, Solomon E, He J. Clinical outcome of non-surgical root canal treatment using a single-cone technique with endosequence bioceramic sealer: A retrospective analysis. J Endod. 2018; 44: 941-945.
  • Jeong JW, DeGraft-Johnson A, Dorn SO, Di Fiore PM. Dentinal tubule penetration of a calcium silicate-based root canal sealer with different obturation methods. J Endod. 2017; 43: 633-637.
  • Wang Z. Bioceramic materials in endodontics. Endodontic topics. 2015; 32: 3-30.
  • Amida A, Aripin D, Hayati AT, Latief FDE, Djustiana N, Cahyanto A, et al. Differences of micro-CT evaluation of the obturation sealing capability between thermoplastic carrier-based condensing techniques and lateral heat condensation techniques. Padjadjaran J Dent. 2022; 34: 174-183.
  • Aksoy U, Küçük M, Versiani MA, Orhan K. Publication trends in micro-CT endodontic research: a bibliometric analysis over a 25-year period. Int Endod J. 2021; 54: 343-353.
  • Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971; 32: 271-275.
  • Angerame D, De Biasi M, Pecci R, Bedini R. Filling ability of three variants of the single-cone technique with bioceramic sealer: a micro-computed tomography study. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2020; 31: 91.
  • Mancino D, Kharouf N, Cabiddu M, Bukiet F, Haïkel Y. Microscopic and chemical evaluation of the filling quality of five obturation techniques in oval-shaped root canals. Clin Oral Investig. 2021; 25: 3757-3765.
  • Viapiana R, Moinzadeh AT, Camilleri L, Wesselink PR, Tanomaru Filho M, Camilleri J. Porosity and sealing ability of root fillings with gutta-percha and BioRoot RCS or AH Plus sealers. Evaluation by three ex vivo methods. Int Endod J. 2016; 49: 774-782.
  • Keleş A, Alcin H, Kamalak A, Versiani MA. Micro-CT evaluation of root filling quality in oval-shaped canals. Int Endod J. 2014; 47: 1177-1184.
  • Başer Can ED, Keleş A, Aslan B. Micro-CT evaluation of the quality of root fillings when using three root filling systems. Int Endod J. 2017; 50: 499-505.
  • Naseri M, Kangarlou A, Khavid A, Goodini M. Evaluation of the quality of four root canal obturation techniques using micro-computed tomography. Iran Endod J. 2013; 8: 89-93.
  • Robberecht L, Colard T, Claisse-Crinquette A. Qualitative evaluation of two endodontic obturation techniques: tapered single-cone method versus warm vertical condensation and injection system: an in vitro study. J Oral Sci. 2012; 54: 99-104.
  • Li GH, Niu LN, Selem LC, Eid AA, Bergeron BE, Chen JH, et al. Quality of obturation achieved by an endodontic core-carrier system with crosslinked gutta-percha carrier in single-rooted canals. J Dent. 2014; 42: 1124-1134.
  • Alshehri M, Alamri HM, Alshwaimi E, Kujan O. Micro-computed tomographic assessment of quality of obturation in the apical third with continuous wave vertical compaction and single match taper sized cone obturation techniques. Scanning. 2016; 38: 352-356.
  • Hörsted-Bindslev P, Andersen MA, Jensen MF, Nilsson JH, Wenzel A. Quality of molar root canal fillings performed with the lateral compaction and the single-cone technique. J Endod. 2007; 33: 468-471.
  • Holmes S, Gibson R, Butler J, Pacheco R, Askar M, Paurazas S. Volumetric evaluation of 5 root canal obturation methods in true tooth 3-dimensional-printed tooth replicas using nano-computed tomography. J Endod. 2021; 47: 485-491.
  • Penha da Silva PJ, Marceliano-Alves MF, Provenzano JC, Dellazari RLA, Gonçalves LS, Alves FRF. Quality of root canal filling using a bioceramic sealer in oval canals: a three-dimensional analysis. Eur J Dent. 2021; 15: 475-480.
  • Buchanan LS. Continuous wave of condensation technique. Endod Prac. 1998; 1: 7-18.
  • Briseño Marroquín B, Wolf TG, Schürger D, Willershausen B. Thermoplastic properties of endodontic gutta-percha: a thermographic in vitro study. J Endod. 2015; 41: 79-82.
  • Schäfer E, Nelius B, Bürklein S. A comparative evaluation of gutta-percha filled areas in curved root canals obturated with different techniques. Clin Oral Investig. 2012; 16: 225-230.
  • Drukteinis S, Bilvinaite G, Tusas P, Shemesh H, Peciuliene V. Porosity distribution in single cone root canal fillings performed by operators with different clinical experience: A microCT assessment. J Clin Med. 2021;10:2569. 
  • Swain MV, Xue J. State of the art of Micro-CT applications in dental research. Int J Oral Sci. 2009; 1: 177-188.
  • Hammad M, Qualtrough A, Silikas N. Evaluation of root canal obturation: a three-dimensional in vitro study. J Endod. 2009; 35: 541-544.
  • Somma F, Cretella G, Carotenuto M, Pecci R, Bedini R, De Biasi M, et al. Quality of thermoplasticized and single point root fillings assessed by micro-computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2011; 44: 362-369.
  • Mohamed D, Ali R, Badawy RE. Comparative evaluation of the interfacial adhesion ability of single versus lateral compaction obturation techniques using different sealer types: An in vitro study. Egyptian Dent J. 2022; 68: 2967-2983.
  • Ali A, Bhosale A, Pawar S, Kakti A, Bichpuriya A, Agwan MA. Current trends in root canal irrigation. Cureus. 2022; 14: e24833.
  • Shen Y, Gao Y, Qian W, Ruse ND, Zhou X, Wu H, et al. Three-dimensional numeric simulation of root canal irrigant flow with different irrigation needles. J Endod. 2010; 36: 884-889.