Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Dept. of Pedodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

2 Dept. of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

3 Dept. of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

4 Dept. of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

Abstract

Statement of the Problem:Several factors affect the success of pulp therapy of primary teeth, including cleaning and shaping of the root canals and the quality of obturation as the most important steps.
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to compare the quality of different root canal obturation techniques in deciduous mandibular molars subsequent to preparation of the root canals with the rotary technique, using the photo stimulated phosphor (PSP) digital radiographic technique.
Materials and Method:In this in vitro study, 221 root canals were selected in 80 extracted deciduous mandibular second molars. The root canals were prepared with a modified protocol for ProTaper NiTi rotary files and with only two instruments (SX and S2) and obturated using a lentulo spiral, condensation technique, an anesthetic syringe, and tuberculin syringe techniques with ZOE paste. The quality of the root canal obturation (obturation length and the number and sizes of the voids) was evaluated using PSP radiographic technique. Data were analyzed with SPSS 21, using chi-squared, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests.
Results:There were no significant differences in the obturation length (p = 0.285) and the number of voids (p = 0.061) between the study groups; however, there were significant differences in void sizes between the study groups (p = 0.001). The condensation and tuberculin syringe groups exhibited the best and worst results considering the obturation length, respectively. Lentulo and anesthetic syringe techniques have also exhibited acceptable results. The condensation and anesthetic syringe groups exhibited the minimum and maximum number of voids, respectively. The condensation and lentulo groups exhibited the maximum and minimum void sizes, respectively.
Conclusion:If implemented correctly, there will be no significant difference among the experienced root canal obturation techniques considering obturation length and the number of voids.

Keywords

1. Musale PK, Mujawar SA. Evaluation of the efficacy of rotary vs. hand files in root canal preparation of primary teeth in vitro using CBCT. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent . 2014; 15: 113–120. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

2. Makarem A, Ravandeh N, Ebrahimi M. Radiographic assessment and chair time of rotary instruments in the pulpectomy of primary second molar teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2014; 8: 84–89. [PMC free article] [PubMed[Google Scholar]

3. Javadinejad S, Zarejahromi M, Mirenayat A. In vitro comparison of rotary instruments and K-files in root canal preparation of primary molars. JDM. 2008; 21: 196–199. [Google Scholar]

4. Luiz Pinhero S, Santos Neves L, Imparato LSN, Duarte DA, Silveria Bueno CE, Cunha RS. Analysis of the instrumentation time and cleaning between manual and rotary techniques in deciduous molars. RSBO. 2012; 9: 238–244. [Google Scholar]

5. Barr ES, Kleier DJ, Barr NV. Use of nickel-titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent . 1999;21:453–454. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

6. Kahn FH, Rosenberg PA, Schertzer L, Korthals G, Nguyen PN. An in-vitro evaluation of sealer placement methods. Int Endod J. 1997; 30: 181–186. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

7. Huybrechts B, Bud M, Bergmans L, Lambrechts P, Jacobs R. Void detection in root fillings using intraoral analogue, intraoral digital and cone beam CT images. Int Endod J. 2009; 42: 675–685. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

8. Memarpour M, Shahidi S, Meshki R. Comparison of different obturation techniques for primary molars by digitalradiography. Pediatr Dent. 2013; 35: 236–240. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

9. Bawazir OA, Salama FS. Clinical evaluation of root canal obturation methods in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2006; 28: 39–47. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

10. Soğur E, Baksi BG, Gröndahl HG. Imaging of root canal fillings: a comparison of subjective image quality between limitedcone-beam CT, storage phosphor and film radiography. Int Endod J. 2007; 40: 179–185. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

11. Matherne RP, Angelopoulos C, Kulild JC, Tira D. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to identify root canal systems in vitro. J Endod. 2008; 34: 87–89. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

12. Cederberg RA, Tidwell E, Frederiksen NL, Benson BW. Endodontic working length assessment: Comparison of storage phosphor digital imaging and radiographic film. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998; 85: 325–328. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

13. Bahrololoomi Z, Tabrizizadeh M, Salmani L. In Vitro Comparison of Instrumentation Time and Cleaning Capacity between Rotary and Manual Preparation Techniques in Primary Anterior Teeth. JDT. 2007; 4: 59–62. [Google Scholar]

14. Kuo CI, Wang YL, Chang HH, Huang GF, Lin CP, Guo MK. Application of Ni-Ti rotary files for pulpectomy in primary molars. J Dent Sci. 2006; 1:10–15. [Google Scholar]

15. Kummer TR, Calvo MC, Cordeiro MM, de Sousa Vieira R, de Carvalho Rocha MJ. Ex vivo study of manual and rotary instrumentation techniques in human primary teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008; 105: e84–e92. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

16. Dandashi MB, Nazif MM, Zullo T, Elliott MA, Schneider LG, Czonstkowsky M. An in vitro comparison of three endodontic techniques for primary incisors. Pediatr Dent. 1993; 15: 254–256. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

17. Aylard SR, Johnson R. Assessment of filling techniques for primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 1987; 9: 195–198. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

18. Mazaheri R, Bahrololoomi Z, Khalili Moghaddam D. The comparative assessment of apical microleakage of primary teeth when filled with two different techniques. J Dent Sch. 2007; 25: 304–309. [Google Scholar]

19. Casamassimo PS, Fields Jr HW, McTigue DJ, Nowak A. Pediatric dentistry: infancy through adolescence. 5th ed. Stlouis: Elsevier; 2013. pp. 344–345. [Google Scholar]

20. Peters CI, Koka RS, Highsmith S, Peters OA. Calcium hydroxide dressings using different preparation and application modes: density and dissolution by simulated tissue pressure. Int Endod J. 2005; 38: 889–895. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

21. Subba Reddy VV, Shakunthala B, Reddy SVV, Subba RVV. Comparative assessment of three obturating techniques in primary molars: An in-vivo study. Endodontology. 1997; 9: 13–16. [Google Scholar]

22. Estrela C, Mamede Neto I, Lopes HP, Estrela CR, Pécora JD. Root canal filling with calcium hydroxide using different techniques. Braz Dent J. 2002; 13: 53–56. [PubMed[Google Scholar]