Huang Y, Xue X, Spelke E, Huang L, Zheng W, Peng K. The aesthetic preference for symmetry dissociates from early-emerging attention to symmetry. Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 6263.
 Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. Skeletal asymmetry in esthetically pleasing faces. Angle Orthod. 1991; 61: 43-48.
 Grammer K, Thornhill R. Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. J Comp Psychol. 1994; 108: 233-242.
 Macgregor FC. Social and psychological implications of dentofacial disfigurement. Angle Orthod. 1970; 40: 231-233.
 Rumsey N, Clarke A, White P, Wyn-Williams M, Garlick W. Altered body image: appearance-related concerns of people with visible disfigurement. J Adv Nurs. 2004; 48: 443-453.
 Patcas R, Bernini DAJ, Volokitin A, Agustsson E, Rothe R, Timofte R. Applying artificial intelligence to assess the impact of orthognathic treatment on facial attractiveness and estimated age. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 48: 77‐83.
 McAvinchey G, Maxim F, Nix B, Djordjevic J, Linklater R, Landini G. The perception of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional simulated images. Angle Orthod. 2014; 84: 957-965.
 Monnet-Corti V, Antezack A, Pignoly M. Perfecting smile esthetics: keep it pink. Orthod Fr. 2018; 89: 771-780.
 Chisini LA, Noronha TG, Ramos EC, Dos*Santos-Junior RB, Sampaio KH, Faria ESAL, et al. Does the skin color of patients influence the treatment decision-making of dentists? A randomized questionnaire-based study. Clin Oral Investig. 2019; 23: 1023-1030.
 Little AC, Burt DM, Penton-Voak IS, Perrett DI. Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proc Biol Sci. 2001; 268(1462): 39-44.
 Bispo*de*Carvalho*Barbosa P, de*Andrade*Vieira W, de*Macedo*Bernardino I, Costa MM, Pithon MM, Paranhos LR. Aesthetic facial perception and need for treatment in simulated laterognathism in male faces of different ethnicities. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 23: 407-413.
 Lee SF, Dumrongwongsiri S, Lo LJ. Perception of Lip Cant as a Sign of Facial Deformity: Assessment by Laypersons and Professionals on Composite Face Photographs. Ann Plast Surg. 2019; 82(1S Suppl 1): S140‐ S143.
 Chu EA, Farrag TY, Ishii LE, Byrne PJ. Threshold of visual perception of facial asymmetry in a facial paralysis model. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2011; 13: 14-19.
 Naini FB, Donaldson AN, McDonald F, Cobourne MT. Assessing the influence of asymmetry affecting the mandible and chin point on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 70: 192-206.
 Meyer-Marcotty P, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A, Bareis U, Hartmann J, Kochel J. Three-dimensional perception of facial asymmetry. Eur J Orthod. 2011; 33: 647-653.
 Hohman MH, Kim SW, Heller ES, Frigerio A, Heaton JT, Hadlock TA. Determining the threshold for asymmetry detection in facial expressions. Laryngoscope. 2014; 124: 860-865.
 Mertens I, Siegmund H, Grusser OJ. Gaze motor asymmetries in the perception of faces during a memory task. Neuropsychologia. 1993; 31: 989-998.
 Jarosz KF, Bosio JA, Bloomstein R, Jiang SS, Vakharia NS, Cangialosi TJ. Perceptions of chin asymmetries among dental professionals and laypersons. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018; 154: 201-212.
 Pinho S, Ciriaco C, Faber J, Lenza MA. Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 132: 748-753.
 Kokich VO, Kokich VG, Kiyak HA. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 130: 141-151.
 Dong T, Ye N, Yuan L, Wu S, Xia L, Fang B. Assessing the Influence of Chin Asymmetry on Perceived Facial Esthetics With 3-Dimensional Images. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020; S0278-2391: 30311-30316.
 Chou PY, Denadai R, Chen SH, Tseng HJ, Hsu CK, Wang SW, et al. Identifying Three-Dimensional Facial Fluctuating Asymmetry in Normal Pediatric Individuals: A Panel Assessment Outcome Study of Clinicians and Observers. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2019; 8. DOI: 10.3390/jcm8050648.