Journal of Dentistry

Correlation between Skeletal Age and Metacarpal Bones and Metacarpophalangeal Joints Dimensions

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Abdolaziz Haghnegahdar 1
Hamidreza Pakshir 2
Ilnaz Ghanbari 3

1 Dept. of Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

2 Dept. of Maxillofacial Orthodontics School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

3 Postgraduate Student Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.30476/dentjods.2019.44904
Abstract
Statement of the Problem: Currently, two major methods have been introduced for bone age assessment using left hand radiography. The first approach is Greulich and Pyle, which is very subjective. The second method is Tanner and Whitehouse, which is very time consuming and its morphological criteria are not quantitative, therefore it is hardly used.
Purpose:The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between skeletal age and bone size and joint space measurements among Asian children using hand radiographs and using this correlation as an aid in determining bone age.
Materials and Method:In this analytic research, 304 hand radiographs from Asian children with normal development have been included in this study (155 female, 149 male). Two radiologists using Greulich and Pyle method assessed their bone ages. The 2nd-5th metacarpal bones length and width and 2nd-5th metacarpophalangeal joints width and length were manually measured by Adobe Photoshop and compared with subjects’ skeletal age. Pearson correlation was used to determine the relationship.
Results:Pearson correlation between bone age and metacarpal bones length was 0.902-0.938; metacarpal bones width was 0.452-0.850; metacarpophalangeal joints width was 0.656 - 0.811, and metacarpophalangeal joints length was 0.920 - 0.947.
Conclusion:Regarding Pearson correlation, metacarpophalangeal joints length, metacarpal bones length, metacarpophalangeal joints width, and metacarpal bones width showed significant relationship with bone age, respectively.These measurements can be used as accessory criteria for bone age assessment using left hand radiography, to reduce inter-observer reading differences.

Keywords

Skeletal age ● Metacarpal bones ● Metacarpophalangeal joints ● Dimensions

 

Statement of the Problem: Currently, two major methods have been introduced for bone age assessment using left hand radiography. The first approach is Greulich and Pyle, which is very subjective. The second method is Tanner and Whitehouse, which is very time consuming and its morphological criteria are not quantitative, therefore it is hardly used.

Purpose:The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between skeletal age and bone size and joint space measurements among Asian children using hand radiographs and using this correlation as an aid in determining bone age.

Materials and Method:In this analytic research, 304 hand radiographs from Asian children with normal development have been included in this study (155 female, 149 male). Two radiologists using Greulich and Pyle method assessed their bone ages. The 2nd-5th metacarpal bones length and width and 2nd-5th metacarpophalangeal joints width and length were manually measured by Adobe Photoshop and compared with subjects’ skeletal age. Pearson correlation was used to determine the relationship.

Results:Pearson correlation between bone age and metacarpal bones length was 0.902-0.938; metacarpal bones width was 0.452-0.850; metacarpophalangeal joints width was 0.656 - 0.811, and metacarpophalangeal joints length was 0.920 - 0.947.

Conclusion:Regarding Pearson correlation, metacarpophalangeal joints length, metacarpal bones length, metacarpophalangeal joints width, and metacarpal bones width showed significant relationship with bone age, respectively.These measurements can be used as accessory criteria for bone age assessment using left hand radiography, to reduce inter-observer reading differences.

 

1. Poznanski AK, Hernandez RJ, Guire KE, Bereza UL, Garn SM. Carpal length in children– a useful measurement in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and some concenital malformation syndromes. Radiology. 1978; 129:661–668. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Cameron N, Marshall WA, Healy MJR, Goldstein H. Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW3 Method) 3rd ed. London: WB Saunders, Harcourt Publishers Ltd; 2001. pp. 110–117. [Google Scholar]
3. Pyle SI, Waterhouse AM, Greulich WW. A radiographic standard of reference for the growing hand and wrist. 1st ed. Cleveland, OH: The Press of Case Western Reserve University; 1971. pp. 73–86. [Google Scholar]
4. Greulich WW, Pyle SI. Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. 2nd ed. California: Stanford University Press; 1959. pp. 61–64. [Google Scholar]
5. Roche AF, Rohmann CG, French NY, Dávila GH. Effect of training on replicability of assessments of skeletal maturity (Greulich-Pyle) Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1970; 108: 511–515. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. King DG, Steventon DM, O'Sullivan MP, Cook AM, Hornsby VP, Jefferson IG, et al. Reproducibility of bone ages when performed by radiology registrars: an audit of Tanner and Whitehouse II versus Greulich and Pyle methods. Br J Radiol. 1994; 67: 848–851. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Marshall WA, Healy MJR, Goldstein H. Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height. 2nd ed. London, UK: Academic Press; 1975. pp. 92–98. [Google Scholar]
8. Tanner JM, Gibbons RD. A computerized image analysis system for estimating Tanner-Whitehouse 2 bone age. Horm Res. 1994; 42: 282–287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Tanner JM, Oshman D, Lindgren G, Grunbaum JA, Elsouki R, Labarthe D. Reliability and validity of computer-assisted estimates of Tanner-Whitehouse skeletal maturity (CASAS): comparison with the manual method. Horm Res. 1994; 42:288–294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Dickhaus H, Wastl S. Computer assisted bone age assessment. Medinfo. 1995; 8 Pt 1: 709–713. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11. Cao F, Huang HK, Pietka E, Gilsanz V. Digital hand atlas and web-based bone age assessment: system design and implementation. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2000; 24: 297–307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Pietka BE, Pośpiech S, Gertych A, Cao F, Huang HK, Gilsanz V. Computer automated approach to the extraction of epiphyseal regions in hand radiographs. J Digit Imaging. 2001; 14: 165–172. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Gertych A, Zhang A, Sayre J, Pospiech-Kurkowska S, Huang HK. Bone age assessment of children using a digital hand atlas. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2007; 31: 322–331. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. Pfeil A, Böttcher J, Seidl BE, Heyne JP, Petrovitch A, Eidner T, et al. Computer-aided joint space analysis of the metacarpal-phalangeal and proximal-interphalangeal finger joint: normative age-related and gender-specific data. Skeletal Radiol. 2007; 36: 853–864. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15. Pfeil A, Böttcher J, Schäfer ML, Seidl BE, Schmidt M, Petrovitch A, et al. Normative reference values of joint space width estimated by computer-aided joint space analysis (CAJSA): the distal interphalangeal joint. J Digit Imaging. 2008; 21 Suppl 1: 104–112. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Thodberg HH, van Rijn RR, Tanaka T, Martin DD, Kreiborg S. A paediatric bone index derived by automated radiogrammetry. Osteoporos Int. 2010; 21: 1391–1400. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Journal of Dentistry
Volume 20, Issue 3 - Serial Number 64
September 2019
Pages 159-164

  • Receive Date 05 April 2018
  • Revise Date 28 August 2018
  • Accept Date 01 October 2018
  • First Publish Date 01 September 2019
  • Publish Date 01 September 2019

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Guide for Reviewers

Contact Us