Shear Bond Strength of a Multi-Mode Adhesive to Bur-Cut and Er,Cr:YSGG Lased Dentin in Different Output Powers

Shadman, Niloofar; Farzin Ebrahimi, Shahram; Amanpour, Sara; Mehdi Zadeh, Siavash

doi:10.30476/dentjods.2019.44922

Shear Bond Strength of a Multi-Mode Adhesive to Bur-Cut and Er,Cr:YSGG Lased Dentin in Different Output Powers

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Niloofar Shadman ¹

Shahram Farzin Ebrahimi ¹

Sara Amanpour ²

Siavash Mehdi Zadeh ³

¹ Dept. of Operative Dentistry, Oral and Dental Diseases Research Center, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

² Dept. of Oral Pathology, Oral and Dental Diseases Research Center, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

³ Postgraduate Student, Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.30476/dentjods.2019.44922

Abstract

Statement of the Problem: Universal or multi-mode adhesives are new adhesive systems that can be used in both etch-and-rinse (ER) and self-etch (SE) modes. Lesser technical sensitivity and dual use of these adhesives have made them popular among dentists. Studies are being conducted to analyze the advantages and disadvantages these adhesives in different conditionsPurpose: The aim of this study was to compare shear bond strength (SBS) of a multi-mode adhesive in different etching modes to Er,Cr:YSGG laser ablated and bur-cut dentin.Materials and Method: Buccal and lingual surfaces of 30 sound human molars, randomly divided to three groups, were prepared by bur and Er,Cr:YSGG (4 Watt and 5 Watt, 20 Hz, 96% water, 60% air, and 600-µm spot size) to reach a flat surface in superficial dentin. Each group was randomly divided into 2 subgroups (ER and SE), and then Scotchbond Universal adhesive was applied. Composite cylinders were attached to the surfaces and cured. Specimens were stored in 37 °C water for 24 hours and thermocycled (500 cycles) and were tested for SBS and failure modes were determined by stereomicroscope. Data was analyzed using SPSS19 and one- way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc tests and p < 0.05 was considered as significance level.Results: Bur-cut dentin with ER method had the highest mean SBS value (33.80 MPa). SBS in bur-cut and 4Watt laser in ER mode were significantly higher than SE mode (p= 0.002 and p= 0.000 respectively). Highest mean SBS value in lased dentin was achieve in 4 Watt ER mode.Conclusion: SBS of Scotchbond universal adhesive to dentine is highest in bur-cut and ER mode and in 4-Watt lased-dentin is higher than 5-Watt lased-dentin. Moreover, in 4-Watt lased-dentin, SBS of ER mode is more than SE mode.Key Words ● Adhesive ● Bond Strength, Laser ● Dentin

Keywords

Adhesive

Bond Strength

Laser

Dentin

1. Martens LC. Laser physics and a review of laser applications in dentistry for children. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2011; 12: 61–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

2. Hibst R. Lasers for caries removal and cavity preparation: State of the art and future directions. J Oral Laser Applications. 2002; 2: 202–212. [Google Scholar]

3. Kataumi M, Nakajima M, Yamada T, Tagami J. Tensile bond strength and SEM evaluation of Er:YAG laser irradiated dentin using dentin adhesive. Dent Mater J. 1998; 17:125–138. [Google Scholar]

4. Dela Rosa A, Sarma AV, Le CQ, Jones RS, Fried D. Peripheral thermal and mechanical damage to dentin with microsecond and sub-microsecond 9.6 microm, 2.79 microm, and 0.355 microm laser pulses. Lasers Surg Med. 2004; 35: 214–228. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Dunn WJ, Davis JT, Bush AC. Shear bond strength and SEM evaluation of composite bonded to Er:YAG laser-prepareddentin and enamel. Dent Mater. 2005; 21: 616–624. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

6. Sun X, Ban J, Sha X, Wang W, Jiao Y, Wang W, et al. Effect of Er,Cr:YSGG Laser at Different Output Powers on the Micromorphology and the Bond Property of Non-Carious Sclerotic Dentin to Resin Composites. PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0142311. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7. Obeidi A, McCracken MS, Liu PR, Litaker MS, Beck P, Rahemtulla F. Enhancement of bonding to enamel and dentin prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Lasers Surg Med. 2009; 41: 454–462. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent. 2014; 42: 800–807. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

9. Shadman N, Farzin-Ebrahimi Sh, Mortazavi-Lahijani E, Ghaderi A. Shear bond strength of different adhesive systems to normal and caries-affected dentin. J Oral Health Oral Epidemiol. 2015; 4: 87–93. [Google Scholar]

10. Muñoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NH. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent. 2013; 41: 404–411. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

11. Perdigão J, Kose C, Mena-Serrano AP, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A, et al. A new universal simplified adhesive: 18-month clinical evaluation. Oper Dent. 2014; 39: 113–127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Berry TP, Watanabe H, Erickson RL, et al. Influence of different etching modes on bond strength and fatigue strength to dentinusing universal adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 2016; 32: e9–e21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

13. Lee BS, Lin PY, Chen MH, Hsieh TT, Lin CP, Lai JY, et al. Tensile bond strength of Er,Cr:YSGG laser-irradiated human dentin and analysis of dentin-resin interface. Dent Mater. 2007; 23: 570–578. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. Van Landuyt, KL Snauwaert, J De, Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials. 2007; 28: 3757–3785. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15. Unlu N, Gunal S, Ulker M, Ozer F, Blatz MB. Influence of operator. Experience on in vitro bond strength of dentin adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2012; 14: 223–227. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Baldissara P, Catapano S, Scotti R. Clinical and histological evaluation of thermal injury thresholds in human teeth: a preliminary study. J Oral Rehabil. 1997; 24: 791–801. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17. Keller U, Hibst R, Geurtsen W, Schilke R, Heidemann D, Klaiber B, et al. Erbium:YAG laser application in caries therapy. Evaluation of patient perception and acceptance. J Dent . 1998; 26: 649–656. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

18. Esteves-Oliveira M, Zezell DM, Apel C, Turbino ML, Aranha AC, Eduardo Cde P, et al. Bond strength of self-etching primer to bur cut, Er,Cr:YSGG, and Er:YAG lased dentalsurfaces. Photomed Laser Surg. 2007; 25: 373–380. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

19. Obeidi A, Liu PR, Ramp LC, Beck P, Gutknecht N. Acid-etch interval and shear bond strength of Er,Cr:YSGG laser-prepared enamel and dentin. Lasers Med Sci. 2010; 25: 363–369. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. Shahabi S, Chiniforush N, Bahramian H, Monzavi A, Baghalian A, Kharazifard MJ. The effect of erbium family laser on tensile bond strength of composite to dentin in comparison with conventional method. Lasers Med Sci. 2013; 28: 139–142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

21. Paghdiwala AF, Vaidyanathan TK, Paghdiwala MF. Evaluation of erbium:YAG laser radiation of hard dental tissues: analysis of temperaturechanges, depth of cuts and structural effects. Scanning Microsc. 1993; 7: 989–997. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

22. Jaberi Ansari Z, Fekrazad R, Feizi S, Younessian F, Kalhori KA, Gutknecht N. The effect of an Er,Cr:YSGG laser on the micro-shear bond strength of composite to the enamel and dentin of human permanent teeth. Lasers Med Sci. 2012; 27: 761–765. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

23. Isolan CP, Valente LL, Münchow EA, Basso GR, Pimentel AH, Schwantz JK, da Silva. Bond strength of a universal bonding agent and other contemporary dental adhesives applied on enamel, dentin, composite, and porcelain. Appl Adhes Sci. 2014; 2:1–10. [Google Scholar]

24. Ayar MK, Erdermir F. Bonding strength of universal adhesives to Er,Cr:YSGG Laser-Irradiated Dentin. Niger J Clin Pract. 2018; 21: 93–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

25. Buyukhatipoglu I, Ozsevik AS, Secilmis A, Usumez A. Effect of dentin laser irradiation at different pulse settings on microtensile bondstrength of flowable resin. Dent Mater J. 2016; 35: 82–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

26. Yazici AR, Karaman E, Tuncer D, Berk G, Ertan A. Effect of an Er, Cr: YSGG laser preparation on dentin bond strength of a universal adhesive. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2016; 30: 2477–2484. [Google Scholar]

27. Moszner N, Salz U, Zimmermann J. Chemical aspects of self-etching enamel-dentin adhesives: a systematic review. Dent Mater. 2005; 21: 895–910. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

28. Placido E, Meira JB, Lima RG, Muench A, de Souza RM, Ballester RY. Shear versus micro-shear bond strength test: a finite element stress analysis. Dent Mater. 2007; 23: 1086–1092. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

29. Sabatini C. Effect of phosphoric acid etching on the shear bond strength of two self-etch adhesives. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013; 21: 56–62. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

30. Wei S, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Tagami J. Effect of caries-affected dentin hardness on the shear bond strength of currentadhesives. J Adhes Dent. 2008; 10: 431–440. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

31. Marchesi G, Frassetto A, Mazzoni A, Apolonio F, Diolosà M, Cadenaro M, et al. Adhesive performance of a multi-mode adhesive system: 1-year in vitro study. J Dent. 2014; 42: 603–612. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]