Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Dept. of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

2 Graduated Dental Student, Student Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran.

Abstract

Statement of the Problem: Low pH of self-etch adhesives might cause suboptimal polymerization.
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of dentin depth (deep and superficial) on polymerization efficacy of two self-etch adhesives, with different pH by means of Knoop hardness test.
Materials and Method: In this in vitro study, sixty sound molars were used to prepare 30 superficial dentin and 30 deep dentin specimens. Dentin specimens of each depth were randomly distributed into two equal subgroups (N=15) and bonded by either Adper Prompt L-Pop (strong self-etch adhesive) or Adper Easy Bond (mild self-etch adhesive). Knoop hardness test was employed to evaluate degree of cross-linking of the adhesives. Data were analyzed with SPSS 16, using two-way ANOVA to compare mean hardness values of the study groups (p < 0.05).
Results: There was no interaction effect between dentin depth and the type of adhesive (p = 0.36). Regardless of dentin depth, hardness of Adper Easy Bond was significantly higher than that of Adper Prompt L-pop (p < 0.001). Moreover, both the adhesives showed higher hardness when bonded to superficial dentin compared to deep dentin (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Degree of cross-linking of the self-etch adhesive with mild acidity was more than that of the strong self-etch adhesive after light-curing. Surface hardness of both adhesives was higher on superficial dentin compared to deep dentin.

Keywords

1. Wang Y, Spencer P. Physiochemical interactions at the interfaces between self-etch adhesive systems and dentine. J Dent. 2004; 32: 567–579. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

2. do Amaral RC, Stanislawczuk R, Zander-Grande C, Gagler D, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Bond strength and quality of the hybrid layer of one-step self-etch adhesives applied with agitation on dentin. Oper Dent. 2010; 35: 211–219. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

3. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 215–235. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

4. Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials. 2007; 28: 3757–3785. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

5. Zhang Y, Wang Y. Distinct photopolymerization efficacy on dentin of self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res. 2012; 91: 795–799. [PMC free article] [PubMed[Google Scholar]

6. Inoue S, Koshiro K, Yoshida Y, De Munck J, Nagakane K, Suzuki K, et al. Hydrolytic stability of self-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res. 2005; 84: 1160–1164. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

7. Navarra CO, Cadenaro M, Codan B, Mazzoni A, Sergo V, De Stefano Dorigo E, et al. Degree of conversion and interfacial nanoleakage expression of three one-step self-etch adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009; 117: 463–469. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

8. Cadenaro M, Antoniolli F, Sauro S, Tay FR, Di Lenarda R, Prati C, et al. Degree of conversion and permeability of dental adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005; 113: 525–530. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

9. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yiu C, Cheong C, Hashimoto M, Itou K, et al. Nanoleakage types and potential implications: evidence from unfilled and filled adhesives with the same resin composition. Am J Dent. 2004; 17: 182–190. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

10. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res. 2005; 84: 118–132. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

11. Nomura Y, Ishibashi H, Miyahara M, Shinohara R, Shiraishi F, Arizono K. Effects of dental resin metabolites on estrogenic activity in vitro. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2003; 14: 307–310. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

12. Gauthier MA, Stangel I, Ellis TH, Zhu XX. Oxygen inhibition in dental resins. J Dent Res. 2005; 84: 725–729. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

13. Cardoso Pde C, Loguercio AD, Vieira LC, Baratieri LN, Reis A. Effect of prolonged application times on resin-dentin bond strengths. J Adhes Dent. 2005; 7: 143–149. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

14. Zhang Y, Wang Y. Effect of reactive and un-reactive substrates on photopolymerization of self-etching adhesives with different aggressiveness. Dent Mater J. 2013; 32: 484–491. [PMC free article] [PubMed[Google Scholar]

15. Zhang Y, Wang Y. The effect of hydroxyapatite presence on the degree of conversion and polymerization rate in a model self-etching adhesive. Dent Mater. 2012; 28: 237–244. [PMC free article] [PubMed[Google Scholar]

16. Zhang Y, Wang Y. Hydroxyapatite effect on photopolymerization of self-etching adhesives with different aggressiveness. J Dent. 2012; 40: 564–570. [PMC free article] [PubMed[Google Scholar]

17. Marshall GW Jr. Dentin: microstructure and characterization. Quintessence Int. 1993; 24: 606–617. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

18. Pegado RE, do Amaral FL, Flório FM, Basting RT. Effect of different bonding strategies on adhesion to deep and superficial permanent dentin. Eur J Dent. 2010; 4: 110–117. [PMC free article] [PubMed[Google Scholar]

19. Rode KM, Kawano Y, Turbino ML. Evaluation of curing light distance on resin composite microhardness and polymerization. Oper Dent. 2007; 32: 571–578. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

20. Wang Y, Spencer P. Continuing etching of an all-in-one adhesive in wet dentin tubules. J Dent Res. 2005; 84: 350–354. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

21. Hanabusa M, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Okihara T, Yamamoto T, Momoi Y, et al. Interference of functional monomers with polymerization efficiency of adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci. 2016; 124: 204–209. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

22. Faria-E-Silva AL, Piva E, Moraes RR. Time-dependent effect of refrigeration on viscosity and conversion kinetics of dental adhesive resins. Eur J Dent. 2010; 4: 150–155. [PMC free article] [PubMed[Google Scholar]

23. Feilzer AJ, Dauvillier BS. Effect of TEGDMA/BisGMA ratio on stress development and viscoelastic properties of experimental two-paste composites. J Dent Res. 2003; 82: 824–828. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

24. Ito S, Hashimoto M, Wadgaonkar B, Svizero N, Carvalho RM, Yiu C, et al. Effects of resin hydrophilicity on water sorption and changes in modulus of elasticity. Biomaterials. 2005; 26: 6449–6459. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

25. Fuentes V, Toledano M, Osorio R, Carvalho RM. Microhardness of superficial and deep sound human dentin. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003; 66: 850–853. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

26. Collys K, Slop D, Cleymaet R, Coomans D, Michotte Y. Load dependency and reliability of microhardness measurements on acid-etched enamel surfaces. Dent Mater. 1992; 8: 332–335. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

27. Zhang Y, Wang Y. Improved degree of conversion of model self-etching adhesives through their interaction with dentine. J Dent. 2012; 40: 57–63. [PMC free article] [PubMed[Google Scholar]

28. Zhang Y, Wu N, Bai X, Xu C, Liu Y, Wang Y. Hydroxyapatite induces spontaneous polymerization of model self-etch dental adhesives. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2013; 33: 3670–3676. [PMC free article] [PubMed[Google Scholar]

29. Liu Y, Bai X, Liu YW, Wang Y. Light-Cured Self-Etch Adhesives Undergo Hydroxyapatite-Triggered Self-Cure. J Dent Res. 2016; 95: 334–341. [PMC free article] [PubMed[Google Scholar]

30. Finger WJ, Tani C. Effect of application mode on bonding performance of self-etching adhesives. Am J Dent. 2005; 18: 41–44. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

31. Velasquez LM, Sergent RS, Burgess JO, Mercante DE. Effect of placement agitation and placement time on the shear bond strength of 3 self-etching adhesives. Oper Dent. 2006; 31: 426–430. [PubMed[Google Scholar]

32. Feitosa VP, Correr AB, Correr-Sobrinho L, Sinhoreti MA. Effect of a new method to simulate pulpal pressure on bond strength and nanoleakage of dental adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2012; 14: 517–524. [PubMed[Google Scholar]