Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Dental Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.

2 Dept. of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

3 Dept. of Dental Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, Research Center for Science and Technology in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

4 Statistical Advisor, Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

5 Laser Research Center of Dentistry, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences,Tehran, Iran; Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Statement of the Problem: The risk of debonding of the orthodontic eyelets due to blood contamination from the impacted tooth is a clinical problem that orthodontists face routinely.
Purpose: This study aimed to assess the effect of hemostatic agents (Viscostat clear and Astringedent X) on shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic eyelets bonded with conventional (Transbond XT) and universal adhesive (GC-G Premio bond) adhesives.
Materials and Method: In this experimental study, 84 freshly extracted bovine lower incisors were randomly divided into 7 groups namely TBXT, Blood, SEP, VISCO + TBXT, VISCO + SEP, ASTX + TBXT, and ASTX + SEP groups. In the TBXT group, teeth were etched with phosphoric acid gel, and then, the Transbond XT primer was applied and eyelets were bonded with Transbond XT. In the blood group, first, contamination with blood was done followed by the same procedure as TBXT. In other groups, the teeth were etched with phosphoric acid and based on their group allocation, Transbond XT primer (in TBXT groups), GC-G Premio Bond (in SEP groups), ViscoStat Clear gel (in VISCO groups), or Astringedent X (in ASTX groups) were applied. The SBS was measured for each group and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) was determined.
Results: The mean SBS was 20.79 MPa in VISCO+SEP group, 19.2 MPa in the TBXT group, 16.06 MPa in the SEP group, 15.43 MPa in VISCO+TBXT group, 9.39 MPa in AST-X+TBXT group, and 1.62 MPa in the blood group. The SBS of ASTX+SEP, blood and TBXT+ASTX groups had significant differences from the SBS of the control group (p< 0.05). The ARI score of 0 had the highest frequency in the blood group.
Conclusion: Due to the high coagulative effect of Astringedent X and acceptable SBS of Astringedent X in combination with GC-G Premio bond, this combination can be recommended for exposure of impacted teeth that are at high risk of blood contamination.

Keywords

  • Becker A. Orthodontic treatment of impacted teeth. 3rd ed. Wiley Blackwell: Oxford, United Kingdom; 2012. p.133-135.
  • Kulkarni G, Mishra VK. Enamel Wetness Effects on Microshear Bond Strength of Different Bonding Agents (Adhesive Systems): An in vitro Comparative Evaluation Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016; 17: 399-407.
  • Yazici AR, Yildirim Z, Ertan A, Ozgunaltay G, Dayangac B, Antonson SA, et al. Bond strength of one-step self-etch adhesives and their predecessors to ground versus unground enamel. Eur J Dent. 2012; 6: 280-286.
  • Britta LC, Martins M, França FMG. Influence of different primer application times on bond strength of self-etching adhesive systems to unground enamel. Oper Dent. 2009; 34: 43-50.
  • Sarr M, Mine A, De*Munck J, Cardoso MV, Kane AW, Vreven J, et al. Immediate bonding effectiveness of contemporary composite cements to dentin. Clin Oral Investig. 2010; 14: 569-577.
  • Perdigão J, Geraldeli S. Bonding characteristics of self-etching adhesives to intact versus prepared enamel. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2003; 15: 32-41.
  • Brackett MG, Brackett WW, Haisch LD. Microleakage of Class V resin composites placed using self-etching resins: Effect of prior enamel etching. Quintessence Int. 2006; 37: 109-113.
  • Dalton*Bittencourt D, Ezecelevski IG, Reis A, Van Dijken JW, Loguercio AD. An 18-months’ evaluation of self-etch and etch & rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. Acta Odontol Scand. 2005; 63: 173-178.
  • Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De*Munck J, Van*Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van*Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater. 2005; 21: 864-881.
  • Ogle OE, Swantek J, Kamoh A. Hemostatic agents. Dent Clin North Am. 2011; 55: 433-439.
  • Tarighi P, Khoroushi M. A review on common chemical hemostatic agents in restorative dentistry. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2014; 11: 423-428.
  • Gupta G, Kumar S, Rao H, Garg P, Kumar R, Sharma A, et al. Astringents in dentistry- A review. Asian J Pharm Health Sci. 2012; 2: 428-432.
  • Oksayan R, Sokucu O, Isman N, Kayali K, Cebe M. Effects of hemostatic agents on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Niger J Clin Pract. 2015; 18: 189-193.
  • Årtun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1984; 85: 333-340.
  • Elekdag-Turk S, Turk T, Isci D, Ozkalayci N. Thermocycling effects on shear bond strength of a self-etching primer. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78: 351-356.
  • Eslami*Amirabadi GR, Shirazi M, Shirazi Z. Effect of saliva contamination on shear bond strength of transbond xt and assure universal bonding resin to enamel. J Islam Dent Assoc. 2014; 26: 110-116.
  • Di*Francescantonio M, de*Oliveira MT, Shinohara MS, Ambrosano GMB, Giannini M. Bond strength evaluation of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems on intact and ground human enamel. Braz J Oral Sci 2007; 6: 1462-1466.
  • Hara AT, Amaral CM, Pimenta LA, Sinhoreti MA. Shear bond strength of hydrophilic adhesive systems to enamel. Am J Dent. 1999; 12: 181-184.
  • Khanehmasjedi M, Naseri MA, Khanehmasjedi S, Basir L. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of metallic brackets bonded with two different bonding agents under dry conditions and with saliva contamination. J Chin Med Assoc. 2017; 80: 103-108.
  • Rix D, Foley TF, Mamandras A. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001; 119: 36-42.
  • Kanca J. Resin bonding to wet substrate. II. Bonding to enamel. Quintessence Int. 1992; 23: 625-627.
  • Wakefield CW, Sneed WD, Draughn RA, Davis TN. Composite bonding to dentin and enamel: effect of humidity. Gen Dent. 1996; 44: 508-512.
  • Bishara SE, VonWald L, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. Effect of a self-etch primer/adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001; 119: 621-624.
  • Trakyali G, Oztoprak MO. Plant extract ankaferd blood stopper effect on bond strength. Angle Orthod. 2010; 80: 570-574.
  • Dey S, Shenoy A, Kundapur SS, Das M, Gunwal M, Bhattacharya R. Evaluation of the effect of different contaminants on the shear bond strength of a two-step self-etch adhesive system, one-step, self-etch adhesive system and a total-etch adhesive system. J Int Oral Health. 2016; 8: 378.
  • Güngör AY, Alkis H, Turkkahraman H. Effects of contamination by either blood or a hemostatic agent on the shear bond strength of orthodontic buttons. Korean J Orthod. 2013; 43: 96-100.
  • Karabekiroğlu S, Kök H. Do hemostatic agents affect shear bond strength and clinical bond failure rate of orthodontic brackets? J Adhes Sci Technol. 2018; 32: 103-113.
  • Reynolds I, Von*Fraunhofer J. Direct bonding of orthodontic attachments to teeth: the relation of adhesive bond strength to gauze mesh size. Br J Orthod. 1976; 3: 91-95.
  • Artun N, Arman A, Cehreli SB, Arikan S, Karabulut E, Gulsahi K. Microleakage beneath ceramic and metal brackets bonded with a conventional and an antibacterial adhesive system. Angle Orthod. 2006; 76: 1028-1034.
  • Grubisa HS, Heo G, Raboud D, Glover KE, Major PW. An evaluation and comparison of orthodontic bracket bond strengths achieved with self-etching primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 126: 213-219.
  • Rosa WLO, Piva E, da Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015; 43: 765-776.
  • Saito K, Sirirungrojying S, Meguro D, Hayakawa T, Kasai K. Bonding durability of using self-etching primer with 4-META/MMA-TBB resin cement to bond orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75: 260-265.