Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Dept. of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.

2 Postdoctoral Fellow Researcher, Marquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI 53233, USA.

3 General Dentist, Student Research Committee, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.

4 Dept. of Operative Dentistry, Dental Caries Prevention Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.

5 Dept. of Biostatistics, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.

6 Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Statement of the Problem: The success of root canal therapy depends on root canal irrigation, disinfection, and sealing of root canal. Wettability and roughness of root dentine surface are important factors in root canal disinfection and sealing.
Purpose: This study aimed to assess the effect of chloroform application on roughness and wettability of the root canal walls in endodontic retreatment.
Materials and Method: This in vitro experimental study evaluated 70 sound extracted human anterior teeth. The specimens were then randomly assigned to 7 groups as follows: Chloroform (group 1), 1g gutta percha+chloroform (group 2), 2g gutta percha+ chloroform (group 3), 1g gutta percha+ 1g sealer+ chloroform (group 4), 2g gutta perch+ 2g sealer+chloroform (group 5), 1g sealer + chloroform (group 6) and 2g sealer + chloroform (group 7). One drop of distilled water was placed on each tooth to measure the contact angle and wettability. Photographs were obtained of an area measuring 50×50 µm2 in three directions under an atomic force microscope to measure the roughness. The tooth blocks were exposed to the abovementioned mixtures for 10 min, and then rinsed with saline. The roughness and wettability of each sample were measured before and after treatment. Data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test.
Results: The roughness of all groups significantly decreased following treatment, except for groups 1 and 4. The contact angle increased in all groups after treatment (except for the chloroform group), which indicated decreased wettability. The roughness and the contact angle have shown no correlation.
Conclusion: Application of chloroform for removal of gutta-percha and sealer in endodontic retreatment decreases the roughness and wettability of dentine.

Keywords

  • Johnson W, Kulild JC, Tay F. The core science of endodontics, obturation of the cleaned and shaped root canal system. In: Hargreaves KM, Berman LH, editor. Cohen’s Pathways of the Pulp. 11th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2016. p. 280.
  • Good ML, McCammon A. A removal of gutta-percha and root canal sealer: a literature review and an audit comparing current practice in dental schools. Dent Update. 2012; 39: 703-708.
  • Mushtaq M, Farooq R, Ibrahim M, Khan FY. Dissolving efficacy of different organic solvents on gutta-percha and resilon root canal obturating materials at different immersion time intervals. J Conserv Dent. 2012; 15: 141-145.
  • Sakhaei Manesh V, Giacomin P, Stoll R. Quantitative evaluation of root canal surface roughness after filing with adaptive reciprocating and continuous rotary instruments. Microsc Res Tech. 2017; 80: 657-661.
  • Patil CR, Uppin V. Effect of endodontic irrigating soluteons on the microhardness and roughness of root canal dentin: an in vitroIndian J Dent Res. 2011; 22: 22-27.
  • Huang Y, Orhan K, Celikten B, Orhan AI, Tufenkci P, Sevimay S. Evaluation of the sealing ability of different root canal sealers: a combined SEM and micro-CT study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2018; 26: e20160584.
  • Tummala M, Chandrasekhar V, Rashmi AS, Kundabala M, Ballal V. Assessment of the wetting behavior of three different root canal sealers on root canal dentin. J Conserv Dent. 2012; 15: 109-112.
  • Ha JH, Kim HC, Kim YK, Kwon TY. An Evaluation of Wetting and Adhesion of Three Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers to Intraradicular Human Dentin. Materials (Basel). 2018; 11: 1286.
  • Guo L, Wong PL, Guo F. Correlation of contact angle hysteresis and hydrodynamic lubrication. Tribol Lett. 2015; 45: 58.
  • Kontakiotis EG, Tzanetakis GN, Loizides AL. A comparative study of contact angles of four different root canal sealers. J Endod. 2007; 33: 299-302.
  • Farge P, Alderete L, Ramosb S. Dentin wetting by three adhesive systems: influence of etching time, temperature and relative humidity. J Dent. 2010; 38: 698-706.
  • Pantoja CAMS, Silva DHD, Soares AJ, Ferraz CCR, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, et al. Influence of ethanol on dentin roughness, surface free energy and interaction between AH Plus and root dentin. Braz Oral Res. 2018; 32: e33.
  • Van*Noort R, Barbour M. Basic science for dental materials. In: Van Noort R, editor. Introduction to Dental Materials. 4th ed. UK: Elsevier; 2013. p.54.
  • Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, Tenore G, Romeo U, Migliau G. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2017; 8: 1-17.
  • Hu X, Ling J, Gao Y. Effects of irrigation solutions on dentin wettability and roughness. J Endod. 2010; 36: 1064-1067.
  • Aguilar-Mendoza JA, Rosales-Leal JI, Rodríguez-Valverde MA, González-López S, Cabrerizo-Vílchez MA. Wettability and bonding of self-etching dental adhesives. Influence of the smear layer. Dent Mater.2008;24:994-1000.
  • Mohan RP, Vivekananda*Pai AR. The comparison between two irrigation regimens on the dentine wettability for an epoxy resin based sealer by measuring its contact angle formed to the irrigated dentine. J Conserv Dent. 2015; 18: 275-278.
  • Erdemir A, Eldeniz AU, Belli S. Effect of the gutta-percha solvents on the microhardness and the roughness of human root dentine. J Oral Rehabil. 2004; 31: 1145-1148.
  • Kaufman D, Mor C, Stabholz A, Rotstein I. Effect of gutta-percha solvents on calcium and phosphorus levels of cut human dentin. J Endod. 1997; 23: 614-615.
  • Rotstein I, Cohenca N, Teperovich E, Moshonov J, Mor C, Roman I, et al. Effect of chloroform, xylene, and halothane on enamel and dentin microhardness of human teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999; 87: 366-368.
  • Jain M, Singhal A, Gurtu A, Vinayak V. Influence of ultrasonic irrigation and chloroform on cleanliness of dentinal tubules during endodontic retreatment: an in vitro SEM study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9: ZC11-ZC15.
  • Horvath SD, Altenburger MJ, Naumann M, Wolkewitz M, Schirrmeister JF. Cleanliness of dentinal tubules following gutta-percha removal with and without solvents: a scanning electron microscopic study. Int Endod J. 2009; 42: 1032-1038.
  • Ayad MF, Johnston WM, Rosenstiel SF. Influence of dental rotary instruments on the roughness and wettability of human dentin surfaces. J Prosthet Dent.2009; 102: 81-88.
  • Viapiana R, Moinzadeh AT, Camilleri L, Wesselink PR, Tanomaru*Filho M, Camilleri J. Porosity and sealing ability of root fillings with gutta-percha and BioRoot RCS or AH Plus sealers. Evaluation by three ex vivo methods. Int Endod J. 2016; 49: 774-882.
  • Giardino L, Ambu E, Becce C, Rimondini L, Morra M. Surface tension comparison of four common root canal irrigants and two new irrigants containing antibiotic. J Endod. 2006; 32: 1091-1093.
  • Xu J, He J, Shen Y, Zhou X, Huang D, Gao Y, et al. Influence of endodontic procedure on the adherence of enterococcus faecalis. J Endod. 2019; 45: 943-949.
  • Yassen GH, Sabrah AH, Eckert GJ, Platt JA. Effect of different endodontic regeneration protocols on wettability, roughness, and chemical composition of surface dentin. J Endod. 2015; 41: 956-960.