Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Dept. of Restorative Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

2 Dept. of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School, Guilan University of Medical Science, Guilan, Iran.

3 Dept. of Endodontics, Dental school, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Background: A few studies have examined the masking ability of the combined application of opaquer and resin composites on tooth discoloration.
Purpose: This study investigated the combined application of opaquer-composite to mask discolored backgrounds by utilizing two opaquers and resin composites.
Materials and Method: In this in vitro research, we used two composite resins, Vitalescence (Ultradent) and Gradia Direct (GC), and two opaquers: Pink opaque (Cosmedent) and Creative Color A2 (Cosmedent). Seventy-two specimens were made as disks in 8 groups (n=9), with 1.0mm and 0.5mm thicknesses. One surface of each disk was coated by one of the opaquers and cured. The 4mm-thick composite disks from both composite brands were also made as a reference, representing the inherent color of the material. Then, the composite disks from the opaquer-coated surface were placed on a C4 porcelain disk as a background to simulate a discolored tooth. Color measurement for all specimens was performed using a spectrophotometer device. The color difference of each test group and 4 mm thick disks of the same composite were measured using the formula CIELAB (ΔE * ab). Statistical analysis was performed by using ANOVA and Tukey's Post hoc tests.
Results: Statistically significant differences were observed between the eight groups (p= 0.001). The thickness, composites, and opaquer variants significantly affected the ΔE*. The samples with 1mm thickness, the Vitalescence composite, and the Creative Color opaquer A2, had significantly lower ΔE* than the 0.5mm samples, the Gradia composite, and the Pink opaquer, respectively. The number of samples with desirable ΔE was significantly higher in the Vitalescence composite group than in the Gradia composite, and the Creative Color A2 opaquer had significantly more desirable ΔE than the Pink opaquer.
Conclusion: Most results that achieved acceptable masking ability were obtained with combinations of Creative Color opaquer A2+ Vitalescence / Gradia composite in 0.5 or 1mm thicknesses.

Highlights

Hossein Chalakinia (Google Scholar)

Farideh Darabi (Google Scholar)

Keywords

  • Spaveras A, Vjero O, Anagnostou M, Antoniadou M. Masking the discolored enamel surface with opaquers before direct composite veneering. J Dent Oral Disord Ther. 2015; 3: 1-8.
  • Krastl G, Allgayer N, Lenherr P, Filippi A, Taneja P, Weiger R. Tooth discoloration induced by endodontic materials: a literature review. Dent Traumatol. 2013; 29: 2-7.
  • Meyenberg K. The ideal restoration of endodontically treated teeth-structural and esthetic considerations: a review of the literature and clinical guidelines for the restorative clinician. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2013; 8: 238-268.
  • An JS, Son HH, Qadeer S, Ju SW, Ahn JS. The influence of a continuous increase in thickness of opaque-shade composite resin on masking ability and translucency. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2013; 71: 120-129.
  • Kim SJ, Son HH, Cho BH, Lee IB, Um CM. Translucency and masking ability of various opaque-shade composite resins. J Dent. 2009; 37: 102-107.
  • Miotti L, Santos I, Nicoloso G, Pozzobon R, Susin A, Durand L. The use of resin composite layering technique to mask discolored background: A CIELAB/CIEDE2000 analysis. Oper Dent. 2017; 42: 165-174.
  • Yanikian CRF, Yanikian F, Sundfeld D, Lins RBE, Martins LRM. Direct composite resin veneers in nonvital teeth: a still viable alternative to mask dark substrates. Oper Dent. 2019; 44: E159-E166.
  • Kamishima N, Ikeda T, Sano H. Color and translucency of resin composites for layering techniques. Dent Mater J. 2005; 24: 428-432.
  • Perez BG, Gaidarji B, Righes DZ, Pecho OE, Pereira GKR, Durand LB. Masking ability of resin composites: A scoping review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023; 35: 333-344.
  • Perez BG, Gaidarji B, Palm BG, Ruiz-López J, Pérez MM, Durand LB. Masking ability of resin composites: Effect of the layering strategy and substrate color. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022; 34: 1206-1212.
  • Ghorab SM, Atya HA. Effect of thickness on translucency and masking ability of a recently developed single-shade resin composite with enhanced opacity: An in vitro comparative study. Future Dent J. 2022; 7: 130-135.
  • Falcão A, Silveira MM, Souza NLB, Maroun EV, Mota CS. Direct composite resin veneer using opacifying pigments for anterior aesthetic rehabilitation of discolored teeth: Case report. Nav Dent J. 2023; 50: 15-20.
  • Felippe LA, Monteiro*Jr S, Baratieri LN, Andrada MACd, Ritter AV. Using opaquers under direct composite resin veneers: an illustrated review of the technique. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2003; 15: 327-337.
  • Sampaio EC, Caneschi CS, Albuquerque RC, Ornelas S, Moreira AN, Morgan LFSA. Conservative approach to masking a darkened tooth with a direct composite resin restoration: a case report with 5-year follow-up. Gen Dent. 2022; 70: 17-20.
  • Lehr RM, Perez BG, Dalmolin BGA, Durand LB. Masking ability of the combined application of opaquers and resin composite on discolored backgrounds. Oper Dent. 2022; 47: 225-235.
  • Lim LJ, Chen JW, Su JM, Goodacre B. Comparison of the Masking Ability and Translucency of Different Tooth-Colored Restorative Materials. Pediatr Dent. 2022; 44: 130-135.
  • Ikeda T, Sidhu SK, Omata Y, Fujita M, Sano H. Colour and translucency of opaque‐shades and body‐shades of resin composites. Euro J Oral Sci. 2005; 113: 170-173.
  • Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW. Difference in the colour and colour change of dental resin composites by the back ground. J Oral Rehabil. 2005; 32: 227-233.
  • Douglas RD, Steinhauer TJ, Wee AG. Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 97: 200-208.
  • Darabi F, Radafshar G, Tavangar M, Davaloo R, Khosravian A, Mirfarhadi N. Translucency and masking ability of various composite resins at different thicknesses. J Dent (Shiraz). 2014; 15: 117.
  • Ryan EA, Tam LE, McComb D. Comparative translucency of esthetic composite resin restorative materials. J Can Dent Assoc. 2010; 76: a84-a.
  • Okuda WH. Using a modified subopaquing technique to treat: highly discolored dentition. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000; 131: 945-950.
  • Horie K, Nakajima M, Hosaka K, Kainose K, Tanaka A, Foxton RM, et al. Influences of composite–composite join on light transmission characteristics of layered resin composites. Dent Mater. 2012; 28: 204-211.
  • Kim D, Park S. Evaluation of resin composite translucency by two different methods. Oper Dent. 2013; 38: E76-E90.
  • Khashayar G, Dozic A, Kleverlaan C, Feilzer A, Roeters J. The influence of varying layer thicknesses on the color predictability of two different composite layering concepts. Dent Mater. 2014; 30: 493-498.
  • Emamieh Sh, Sabourimajd Y, Ghasemi A. Effect of ceramic and composite thickness on masking of discoloration. J Dent Sch. 2021; 39: 1-6.
  • Elfakhri F, Alkahtani R, Li C, Khaliq J. Influence of filler characteristics on the performance of dental composites: a comprehensive review. Ceram Int. 2022; 48: 27280-27294.
  • Leyva*Del*Rio D, Johnston WM. Optical characteristics of experimental dental composite resin materials. J Dent. 2022; 118: 103949.
  • Oivanen M, Keulemans F, Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila L. The effect of refractive index of fillers and polymer matrix on translucency and color matching of dental resin composite. Biomater Investig Dent. 2021; 8: 48–53.
  • Hirata R, de*Abreu JL, Benalcázar-Jalkh EB, Atria P, Cascales ÁF, Cantero JS, et al. Analysis of translucency parameter and fluorescence intensity of 5 resin composite systems. J Clin Exp Dent. 2024; 16: e71-e77.