Evaluating Calcium Hydroxide Removal Techniques in Endodontics: A Comparative Analysis

Fallahi Sarvenoei, Vahid; Aminsobhani, Mosen; Farzaneh, Babak; Ketabi, Mohammad Ali

doi:10.30476/dentjods.2025.103049.2416

Evaluating Calcium Hydroxide Removal Techniques in Endodontics: A Comparative Analysis

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Vahid Fallahi Sarvenoei ¹

Mosen Aminsobhani ²

Babak Farzaneh ²

Mohammad Ali Ketabi ²

¹ Dept. of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

² Dept. of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Aja University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.30476/dentjods.2025.103049.2416

Abstract

Background: Endodontic therapy plays a pivotal role in dentistry, with effective removal of intracanal medications crucial for successful treatment. The lingering presence of calcium hydroxide within dentinal walls can impede sealer adhesion and compromise treatment outcomes.
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of various methods for removing calcium hydroxide from different regions of the root canal wall.
Materials and Method: In this in vitro randomized trial study, 108 extracted teeth underwent canal cleaning and shaping using the Dentsply Protaper Gold rotary system. Subsequently, except for the negative control group, all teeth were filled with calcium hydroxide and divided into eight groups. These groups underwent different cleaning protocols involving Gentle Brush or Gentlefile #021 files or master apical file in combination with ethylene-diamine-tetra-acetic acid or sodium hypochlorite solutions. After tooth splitting, stereomicroscopic images were taken, and Digimizer software was utilized to calculate residual calcium levels in coronal, middle, and apical regions. Mann-Whitney test was used to check the effect of the cleaning method and type of washing solution among the methods employed. All the analyses were conducted using SPSS 22.
Results: The results indicated that the Gentle Brush method's superior efficacy in calcium hydroxide removal compared to other files, which was statistically significant (p Value <0.01). Similarly, the ethylene-diamine-tetra-acetic acid rinse solution proved more effective than sodium hypochlorite in clearing calcium hydroxide from the canal wall (p< 0.05).
Conclusion: The findings suggest that a Gentle Brush combined with an ethylene-diamine-tetra-acetic acid washing solution represents the most effective method for canal cleaning and calcium hydroxide removal. This study underscores the importance of employing efficient techniques to enhance treatment quality in endodontic practice.

Highlights

Mohammad Ali Ketabi (Google Scholar)

Keywords

Calcium Hydroxide

Endodontics

Ethylene-Diamine-Tetra-Acetic Acid

Sodium Hypochlorite

Root Canal Preparation

Ong TK, Lim GS, Singh M, Fial AV. Quantitative assessment of root development after regenerative endodontic therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2020; 46: 1856-1866.
Khademi AA, Amini K, Ghodsian B, Zahed SM, Teymori F, Shadmehr E. Removal efficiency of calcium hydroxide intracanal medicament with RinsEndo system in comparison with passive ultrasonic irrigation, an in vitro study. Dent Res J. 2015; 12: 157-160.
Kuga MC, Tanomaru-Filho M, Faria G, Só MVR, Galletti T, Bavello JRS. Calcium hydroxide intracanal dressing removal with different rotary instruments and irrigating solutions: a scanning electron microscopy study. Braz Dent J. 2010; 21: 310-314.
Reyhani MF, Ghasemi N, Milani AS, Asl MA. Antimicrobial effect of nano-calcium hydroxide on the four-and six-week-old Intra-canal enterococcus faecalis biofilm. J Dent Shiraz Univ Med Sci. 2023; 24: 194.
Chawla A, Kumar V. Evaluating the efficacy of different techniques and irrigation solutions for removal of calcium hydroxide from the root canal system: A scanning electron microscope study. J Conservative Dent. 2018; 21: 394-400.
Kourti E, Pantelidou O. Comparison of different agitation methods for the removal of calcium hydroxide from the root canal: Scanning electron microscopy study. JCDE. 2017; 20: 439-444.
Gluskin AH, Peters CI, Peters OA. Minimally invasive endodontics: challenging prevailing paradigms. Br Dent J. 2014; 216: 347-53.
Estrela C, Pécora JD, Estrela CR, Guedes OA, Silva BS, Soares CJ, Sousa-Neto MD. Common operative procedural errors and clinical factors associated with root canal treatment. Braz Dent J. 2017; 28: 179-190.
Rödig T, Hirschleb M, Zapf A, Hülsmann M. Comparison of ultrasonic irrigation and RinsEndo for the removal of calcium hydroxide and Ledermix paste from root canals. Int Endod J. 2011; 44: 1155-1161.
Agrawal P, Garg G, Bavabeedu SS, Arora S, Moyin S, Punathil S. Evaluation of intracanal calcium hydroxide removal with different techniques: a scanning electron microscope study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018; 19: 1463-1468.
Reddy S, Prakash V, Subbiya A, Mitthra S. 100 years of Calcium Hydroxide in Dentistry: A review of literature. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicology. 2020; 14: 1203-1219.
Srivastava AA, Srivastava H, Prasad AB, Raisingani D, Soni D. Effect of calcium hydroxide, chlorhexidine digluconate and camphorated monochlorophenol on the sealing ability of biodentine apical plug. J Clin Diag Res (JCDR). 2016; 10: ZC43.
Jamali S, Jabbari G, Mousavi E, Ahmadizadeh H, Khorram M, Jamee A. The comparison of different irrigation systems to remove calcium hydroxide from the root canal: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pesquisa Brasileira Odontopediatria Clin Integr. 2020; 20: e5404.
Ustun Y, Uzun O, Er O, Canakcı BC, Topuz O. The effect of residual calcium hydroxide on the accuracy of a contemporary electronic apex locator. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2015; 73: 132-136.
Gulabivala K, Ng YL. Factors that affect the outcomes of root canal treatment and retreatment: A reframing of the principles. Int Endo J. 2023; 56: 82-115.
Nouroloyouni A, Safavi*Hir F, Farhang R, Noorolouny S, Salem Milani A, Alyali R. Evaluating in vitro performance of a novel stainless steel rotary system (gentlefile) based on debris extrusion and instrumentation time. BioMed Res Int. 2023; 2023: 9945236.
Shi L, Wu S, Yang Y, Wan J. Efficacy of five irrigation techniques in removing calcium hydroxide from simulated S-shaped root canals. J Dent Sci. 2022; 17: 128-134.
Tamil S, Andamuthu SA, Vaiyapuri R, Prasad A, Jambai SS, Chittrarasu M. A comparative evaluation of intracanal calcium hydroxide removal with hand file, rotary file, and passive ultrasonic irrigation: an in vitro study. J Pharm Bioall Sci. 2019; 11(Suppl 2): S442-S445.
Generali L, Cavani F, Franceschetti F, Sassatelli P, Giardino L, Pirani C, et al. Calcium hydroxide removal using four different irrigation systems: A quantitative evaluation by scanning electron microscopy. Applied Sci. 2021; 12: 271.
Petričević GK, Katić M, Anić I, Salarić I, Vražić D, Bago I. Efficacy of different Er: YAG laser–activated photoacoustic streaming modes compared to passive ultrasonic irrigation in the retreatment of curved root canals. Clin Oral Invest. 2022; 26: 6773-6781.
Swathi P, Uloopi K, Vinay C, RojaRamya KS, Chaitanya P, Ahalya P. Effectiveness of Laser-activated and Ultrasonic Irrigation Techniques in Removal of Calcium Hydroxide and Modified Triple Antibiotic Paste from the Root Canals: An In Vitro Evaluation. Int J Clin Ped Dent. 2023; 16(Suppl 1): S1.
Donnermeyer D, Wyrsch H, Bürklein S, Schäfer E. Removal of calcium hydroxide from artificial grooves in straight root canals: sonic activation using EDDY versus passive ultrasonic irrigation and XPendo Finisher. J Endo. 2019; 45: 322-326.
Salas H, Castrejon A, Fuentes D, Luque A, Luque E. Evaluation of the penetration of CHX 2% on dentinal tubules using Conventional Irrigation, Sonic Irrigation (EDDY) and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI) techniques: An in vitro study. J Clin Exper Dent. 2021; 13: e37.
Rossi-Fedele G, Doğramacı EJ, Guastalli AR, Steier L, de Figueiredo JAP. Antagonistic interactions between sodium hypochlorite, chlorhexidine, EDTA, and citric acid. J Endo. 2012; 38: 426-431.
Solana C, Ruiz-Linares M, Baca P, Valderrama MJ, Arias-Moliz MT, Ferrer-Luque CM. Antibiofilm activity of sodium hypochlorite and alkaline tetrasodium EDTA solutions. J Endo. 2017; 43: 2093-2096.
Nouroloyouni A, Shahi S, Milani AS, Noorolouny S, Farhang R, Azar AY. In vitro apical extrusion of debris and instrumentation time following root canal instrumentation with Reciproc and Reciproc Blue instruments and a novel stainless steel rotary system (Gentlefile) versus manual instrumentation. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Pros. 2023; 17: 136.
Ghahramani Y, Mohammadi N, Baghaei S, Jahandizi NG. Time-Dependent Antibacterial Effects of Citrullus Colocynthis Seed Extract Compared to Calcium Hydroxide in Teeth Infected with Enterococcus Faecalis. J Dent Shiraz Univ Med Sci. 2024; 25: 77.
Mesgarani A, Shahrami F, Ehsani M, Poorsattar BMA. Successful Conservative Endodontic Treatment of Fused Maxillary Incisors: A Case Report. J Dent Shiraz Univ Med Sci. 2012; 13: 80-84.
Pabel AK, Hülsmann M. Comparison of different techniques for removal of calcium hydroxide from straight root canals: an in vitro study. Odontology. 2017; 105: 453-459.
Siqueira Jr JF, Rôças IN. Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. J Endo. 2008; 34: 1291-301.
Karapinar Kazandag M, Sunay H, Tanalp J, Bayirli G. Fracture resistance of roots using different canal filling systems. Int Endod J. 2009; 42: 705-710.
Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod. 2004; 30: 559-567.
Garg R, Singhal A, Agrawal K, Agrawal N. Managing endodontic patients with severe gag reflex by glossopharyngeal nerve block technique. J Endod. 2014; 40: 1498-1500.
Ziarati P, Moghimi S, Arbabi-Bidgoli S, Qomi M. Risk assessment of heavy metal contents (lead and cadmium) in lipsticks in Iran. Int J Chem Eng Appl. 2012; 3: 450.
Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod. 2006; 32: 389-398.
Siqueira Jr*JF, Batista MM, Fraga RC, de*Uzeda M. Antibacterial effects of endodontic irrigants on black-pigmented gram-negative anaerobes and facultative bacteria. J Endod. 1998; 24: 414-416.
Vatanpour M, Toursavadkouhi S, Sajjad S. Comparison of three irrigation methods: SWEEPS, ultrasonic, and traditional irrigation, in smear layer and debris removal abilities in the root canal, beyond the fractured instrument. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2022; 37: 102707.
Jamshidi D, Tahriri M, Mosleh H, Madadpour M, Heidari S, Heydari MA, et al. Effect of Chloroform Application on Roughness and Wettability of the Root Canal Walls in Endodontic Retreatment. J Dent Shiraz Univ Med Sci. 2022; 23: 272.
Bhalla VK, Chockattu SJ. Intracanal delivery of calcium hydroxide: a literature review. Saudi Endo J. 2021; 11: 1-6.
Ghanbarzadegan A, Ajami M, Aminsobhani M. The effect of different combinations of calcium hydroxide as intra-canal medicament on endodontic pain: A randomized clinical trial study. Iran Endod J. 2019; 14: 1-6.
Stuart CH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ, Owatz CB. Enterococcus faecalis: its role in root canal treatment failure and current concepts in retreatment. J Endod. 2006; 32: 93-98.
Sarkees M, Al‑Maarrawi K. Chitosan: A natural substitute of EDTA solution for final irrigation in endodontics treatment. Nigerian J Clin Pract. 2020; 23: 697-703.
Singhal P, Raisingani D, Prasad AB, Yadav J, Srivastava H, Kriti S. Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of the Effects of Different Chelating Agents on the Calcium Content of Root Canal Dentin Using Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Ped Dent. 2024; 17: 647-652.
Mahanubhav N, Ahuja T, Nanda Z, Reddy K, Gawande J, Rane P. A comparative evaluation of effects of three chelating agents on smear layer of root canals of extracted human teeth-An In Vitro Study. J Applied Dent Med Sci. 2020; 6: 1.
Baasch A, Campello AF, Rodrigues RC, Alves FR, Voigt DD, Mdala I, et al. Effects of the iIrrigation needle design on root canal disinfection and cleaning. J Endo. 2024; 50: 1463-1471.
Wigler R, Dvir R, Weisman A, Matalon S, Kfir A. Efficacy of XP‐endo finisher files in the removal of calcium hydroxide paste from artificial standardized grooves in the apical third of oval root canals. Int Endod J. 2017; 50: 700-705.
Abdelnaby HM, Youssef HA, Sadek HS, Abdullatif S. Evaluation of the efficiency of brush file as irrigation agitation technique versus passive ultrasonic irrigation on biofilm eradication and calcium hydroxide removal from straight root canals: A comparative in vitro study. 2023; 9: 11-18.
Cahuana-Vasquez RA, Adam R, Conde E, Grender JM, Cunningham P, Goyal CR, Qaqish J. A 5-week randomized clinical evaluation of a novel electric toothbrush head with regular and tapered bristles versus a manual toothbrush for reduction of gingivitis and plaque. Int J Dent Hyg. 2019; 17: 153-160.
Zmener O, Pameijer C, Banegas G. Effectiveness in cleaning oval‐shaped root canals using Anatomic Endodontic Technology, ProFile and manual instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopic study. Int Endo J. 2005; 38: 356-363.
Reddy KS, Soubhgya M, Begum N, Vuggirala V, Nallagula KH. Comparative evolution of clinical efficacy of manual tooth brush versus chewable tooth brush a randomized clinical trail. Indian J Dent Sci. 2021; 13: 219-23.
Ordinola-Zapata R, Crepps JT, Neelakantan P. Root canal debridement and disinfection in minimally invasive preparation. Minimally Invasive Approaches in Endodontic Practice. 2021; 93-107. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45866-9_5
Gokturk H, Ozkocak I, Buyukgebiz F, Demir O. Effectiveness of various irrigation protocols for the removal of calcium hydroxide from artificial standardized grooves. J Appl Oral Sci. 2017; 25: 290-298.
Behl M, Taneja S, Bhalla VK. Comparative evaluation of novel chelating agents for retrievability of intracanal calcium hydroxide using different irrigation protocols: An in vitro study. Endodontology. 2023; 35: 238-242.
Phillips M, McCLANAHAN S, Bowles W. A titration model for evaluating calcium hydroxide removal techniques. J Appl Oral Sci. 2015; 23: 94-100.
Parikh M, Kishan KV, Solanki NP, Parikh M, Savaliya K, Bindu VH, Devika TD. Efficacy of Removal of Calcium Hydroxide Medicament from Root Canals by Endoactivator and Endovac Irrigation Techniques: A Systematic Review of: In vitro: Studies. Contemp Clin Dent. 2019; 10: 135-142.
Peters OA, Peters CI. Cleaning and shaping of the root canal system. Cohen's Pathway of the Pulp ed. 12th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2020. p. 236-303.
Ordinola‐Zapata R, Martins J, Niemczyk S, Bramante CM. Apical root canal anatomy in the mesiobuccal root of maxillary first molars: influence of root apical shape and prevalence of apical foramina–a micro‐CT study. Int Endo J. 2019; 52: 1218-1227.
Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Loiola LE, Morgental RD, Leonardo RdT, Tanomaru-Filho M. Efficacy of four irrigation needles in cleaning the apical third of root canals. Brazilian Dent J. 2013; 24: 21-24.
Eymirli A, Uyanik O, Nagas E, Calt Tarhan S. Effect of calcium hydroxide removal techniques on the bond strength of root canal sealers. J Adhesion Science and Technology. 2017; 31: 1196-202.
Saji SA, Shetty C, Kaur G, Bajpe S, Chandraprabha C, Shroff R, et al. Comparison of Various Irrigation Techniques for the Removal of Silicone Oil-Based Calcium Hydroxide Intracanal Medicament from the Apical Third: An SEM Study. J Health Allied Sci NU. 2024; 15: 103-108.
Shi L, Wu S, Yang Y, Wan J. Efficacy of five irrigation techniques in removing calcium hydroxide from simulated S-shaped root canals. J Dent Sci. 2022; 17: 128-134.
Adl A, Razavian A, Eskandari F. The efficacy of EndoActivator, passive ultrasonic irrigation, and Ultra X in removing calcium hydroxide from root canals: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2022; 22: 564.