Stress Distribution around Dental Implants and Mandibular Bone Following Inferior Alveolar Nerve Lateralization and Implant Insertion: A Finite Element Analysis

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Postgraduate, Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Endodontics, Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

2 Oral & Maxillofacial Diseases Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

3 Student Research Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

4 Oral & Maxillofacial Diseases Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

10.30476/dentjods.2026.107377.2739
Abstract
Background: Severe mandibular atrophy presents a challenge for dental implant placement, often necessitating inferior alveolar nerve lateralization (IANL).
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate stress distribution in atrophic mandibles following IANL and dental implant insertion, comparing stress distribution across residual mandibular heights and implant configurations after simulated IANL using FEA method.
Materials and Method: Three-dimensional mandibular models derived from computed tomography (CT) scans were used to simulate implant placement after IANL in residual mandibular height models of 15 mm and 20 mm (20 mm included as a comparative reference). Stress distribution was analyzed under a static 100 N vertical (axial) occlusal load with the inferior mandibular border fixed, comparing splinted versus non-splinted prosthetic designs (three-implant splinted configuration versus two-implant bridge-supported configuration) and monocortical versus bicortical implant engagement.
Results: At a mandibular height of 20mm, stress distribution was consistent across configurations. However, at 15mm, stress concentrated along the crestal ridge, mental foramen, and osteotomy margins, exhibiting a broader distribution. A bridge-supported prosthesis demonstrated more favorable stress distribution than three individually fixed implants in the 15mm height models. Bicortical insertion did not significantly alter stress patterns.
Conclusion: IANL facilitates implant placement in severely atrophic mandibles. Implant configuration selection may influence stress concentration in reduced mandibular height models; in the 15 mm models, the bridge-supported configuration showed more favorable stress distribution than the three-implant configuration.

Keywords



Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 29 July 2026

  • Receive Date 02 June 2025
  • Revise Date 12 February 2026
  • Accept Date 28 July 2026
  • First Publish Date 29 July 2026
  • Publish Date 29 July 2026